155

|
|
TOPIC: Photos - Red and White X's
|
|
|
Start
41 to 50 of 358
End
|
User Details are only visible to members.
|
When staff members reject public pictures, we do have a drop down box with reasons and one of those is for "child in picture".
The way it works is that X number of Lifetime members review a public picture. If all X rate it as a Type 1, it goes online as a non-nude picture. If all X rate it as a Type 2, it goes online as a nude picture. If all X rate it as unacceptable it is deleted. If X1 rate it one way and X2 rate it another way, it goes to the staff member queue for a final review and if we reject it, we send a reason. |
||
Gainesville FL |
Username hidden
(1800 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
LOL yeah
I like the idea of a check box or drop down list - child, advertisement, one time I rejected a picture of a guy naked wrestling with a goat. Seriously? This pic was rejected TWO times (no reason) before I finally got it on. I have no idea why. btw thanks to the SLS staff for finally getting the public pic problem resolved. |
||
Chesapeake VA |
Username hidden
(11695 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Good suggestion. Maybe add "Remove the family portrait from the dresser" and for good measure, "Close the toilet seat" to the drop down list. lol
|
||
Youngstown OH |
Username hidden
(11414 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Even having a "Reason" drop-down box to give me a quick "Child in picture" or something like that would have been helpful. Don't need a comment box really.
|
||
Manitowoc WI |
Username hidden
(23 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
We have suggested pic approvers be allowed to make comments but admin thinks that would be creepy. I had to reject a pic because there was a kid standing behind the subject, even though his face was hidden it was clearly a child and it would have been nice to suggest they edit the kid out.
|
||
Youngstown OH |
Username hidden
(11414 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
No, turns out there was a kid far off in the background in the crowd behind me. You can't make out any details, other than it's a child. Honestly I didn't even notice it until I started scrubbing EVERYTHING in the picture except for my body.
Would have been nice to have been told this was the reason right away instead of guessing at edits and re-trying. |
||
Manitowoc WI |
Username hidden
(23 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"I don't see any reason for it to be deleted"
Probably there were twenty copies and each additional marked as unacceptable. Original probably then got deleted. |
||
New York NY |
Username hidden
(149 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Public pictures finally work! =D
Personal pics are still showing as X's though. :( |
||
Toms River NJ |
Username hidden
(446 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
I tried to upload a G-rated pic to my private album twice now and got an automated message that it was deleted. I don't see any reason for it to be deleted (no beast, no kids, just me standing there smiling).
|
||
Manitowoc WI |
Username hidden
(23 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Picture function still not working effectively. Tried to upload in personal folder......x's.
|
||
Atlanta GA |
Username hidden
(2 post)
|
||
Start
41 to 50 of 358
End
|
TOPIC: Photos - Red and White X's
|