
|
|
TOPIC: What is your take after reading our profile
|
|
|
| Created by: Doc_n_Janine | The original post for this thread was deleted. |
|---|
User Details are only visible to members.
|
There may not be any Goofy fuckers (proper name) but there are some really goofy fuckers on here sometimes.
Good luck to the OP. Gina |
||
San Antonio TX |
Username hidden
(4093 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"And the Disney thing? It is, indeed a bit different than having sex with others...unless she's wanting to do Goofy or something."
Admittedly I didn't read the OP's profile, BUT-- that statement sounded to me like someone on SLS might be fucking Goofy. And we all KNOW there are no Goofy fuckers on SLS. But, Snow White and the Seven Little Fuckers... talk about gang bangs and midget porn. Walt, what the hell were you thinking?!?! Although... we'd like Snow White to join us in a threesome. No way we're fucking Goof. Bestiality is just not our thing. OK. I'm sorry for the hijack, I just couldn't resist. :-) |
||
Brooklyn Park MN |
Username hidden
(1668 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
If you’re in a dom/sub relationship, then simply state that up front… problem solved. If not, then everything in the Description should be rewritten with “we” language and not “I”, with a lot more language about her and what she is all about. Why do we say that? Because we’ve met several dozen couples where the man was pushing his girl, and it makes our stomach turn whenever we get that vibe. We are attracted to profiles which convey humor, respect, and class, and that portray the couple as being genuine and real. As your profile is currently written, we doubt you will get much credible interest.
Good luck to you both! |
||
Panama City Beach FL |
Username hidden
(293 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Sexus-
"And the Disney thing? It is, indeed a bit different than having sex with others...unless she's wanting to do Goofy or something. And that would be a whole new forum thread." It was just for a picture...he didn't mean anything to me, LOL |
||
Fort Snelling MN |
Username hidden
(463 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Doc - I was too busy looking at the pictures of "the wife" and never got down to reading your profile.
|
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(30 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
The only think
The only THING I suggested. See? Even Miss "never uses spell check" Grammarian makes mistakes. |
||
San Antonio TX |
Username hidden
(4093 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
San Antonio TX |
Username hidden
(4093 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
I took another look at all the comments here, and only one poster suggested that you weren't a couple.
Many of the rest talked about how the profile was not written from the perspective of a couple, i.e., it's all about you and what you want, and nothing really about what your wife wants. |
||
Gibsonia PA |
Username hidden
(5670 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
It's the "the" in the phrase that bugs me. If you replace it with "my" wife that's fine. I don't call my husband "the husband." It objectifies a person.
Of course, if you change it to "wifey" that will come off chauvinistic too. Can't win, huh? Not sure why hubby is ok but wifey is not, but that's how it'll seem. We're all just saying if you want to attract people to your profile, it helps to reword and change a few things here and there, not to change YOURSELVES or truth about yourselves, that's always good...just in the way some things are worded. Gina |
||
San Antonio TX |
Username hidden
(4093 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Good point Seduction.
If they are looking for that type of people, then I guess it should work, based on your comment. I wouldn't be able to say one way or the other.... |
||
Gibsonia PA |
Username hidden
(5670 post)
|
||
TOPIC: What is your take after reading our profile
|