155

|
|
TOPIC: So whats with the photo content double standards
|
|
|
| Created by: slatternly | The original post for this thread was deleted. |
|---|
1 to 10 of 11
End
|
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Ok well apparently we got someone that approved of our pics because we were able to get them on the profile as public (which I changed) and also as private...thanks soo much for allowing me to vent lol!!
Good luck everyone!!! Toyman's Babygirl |
||
Port St John FL |
Username hidden
(9 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"If that is the case and the other pictures were loaded before the new law went into effect shouldn't those participants of the site still have to obey the same rules as the newer members to make us all follow the same standards? "
Yes...but it ain't a crime if you don't get caught. "Is there anyone that we can send our pics to that would be able to tell me why they are being disapproved of?" Tech -s |
||
Rochester NY |
Username hidden
(10385 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
If that is the case and the other pictures were loaded before the new law went into effect shouldn't those participants of the site still have to obey the same rules as the newer members to make us all follow the same standards?
Is there anyone that we can send our pics to that would be able to tell me why they are being disapproved of? Thanks and have a wonderful evening!!! |
||
Port St John FL |
Username hidden
(9 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
If you do a search on this topic, you will see a lot of responses/theories on why some people have them and others seem to have trouble getting them accepted. It seems to me that alot of the ones that you are seeing may be older...from before the new rules came out. I have seen plenty of shots in peoples private pics that would not be allowed by the new standards.
-s |
||
Rochester NY |
Username hidden
(10385 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Port St John FL |
Username hidden
(9 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
The point is those are the outlines of the new 2257 rule apparently. I could care less either way. I am very lenient when I am approving pics.
-s |
||
Rochester NY |
Username hidden
(10385 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Grob - you can upload nude photos, they just can't be "action" shots, close ups or erect penises.
-s |
||
Rochester NY |
Username hidden
(10385 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Mrs. Toyman - It all depends on who is doing the approval process on your pics. If you are uploading them as private, then it is am sls employee who is reviewing them. If they are public, then it could be any lifetime member who reviews, and everyone has different criteria as to what means what within the rules.
-s |
||
Rochester NY |
Username hidden
(10385 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Port St John FL |
Username hidden
(9 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
We had one of ours approved and then deemed to be XXX lol and yanked. We tried another, but they denied that one. We knew we were pushing the limit on that one though lol.
|
||
San Marcos TX |
Username hidden
(23665 post)
|
||
1 to 10 of 11
End
|
TOPIC: So whats with the photo content double standards
|