I propose a number system as well. I want a number for both people of the couple in which it says how many want to blow me....
1 is a good number, 2, I aint interested, 0 is another number I am not interested in.....

Not to sound crass , but sometimes simple is better.

we've all done it..no harm no foul (;)

after i posted i realized i typed coincidentally when i meant incidental.

oh well others will know what i meant.

where did you get "coincidentally" the descriptor says incidentally.... big difference

but let's not divert the intention of the thread..ok?

I feel that would cause even more confusion.

for instance #1) "coincidentally" could mean stroking from another guy or other things and I am just not into that.

Arms, Legs touching no biggie.

Always I agree that the current system can be misleading. However, such a detailed scale would call more confusion I think. Honestly I think its just easier to ask "tell me what you are into sexually". But its a very nice scale!

I am always a proponent of change, so I say sure. Whether or not it is that system or another, it could be adjusted for the betterment of the site and its members.

Many have discussed the currrent sexual preference options for our profiles on SLS and it seems we could benefit from something different as the current system generates endless confusion and discussions in the forums. Please consider and comment on the one below> Perhaps SLS would be open to adopting it. or we could do it by including it in the text of our profiles if it makes sense... Sex researcher Dr. Alfred Kinsey dealt with the issue by creating the Kinsey Scale: 0=Exclusively heterosexual 1=Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual 2=Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual 3=Equally heterosexual and homosexual 4=Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual 5=Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual 6=Exclusively homosexual