155

|
|
TOPIC: Women talking
|
|
|
| Created by:
ring2s
Original Starting post for this thread: |
|---|
| Lately I have read many profiles requiring the women need to talk before meeting. Why? I am not interested in the woman. It is not necessary to start a dialogue before meeting. I prefer speaking with the man of the couple. Plenty of times I respond not interested. What is your preference ? |
1 to 10 of 31
End
|
User Details are only visible to members.
|
We don't have it in our profile but she always wants to talk to the wife just to make sure she is being pushed into something she doesn't want. WOW, what is wrong with that.
More times then not the woman won't talk so what does that say. |
||
Presque Isle WI |
Username hidden
(182 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Notsovanilla, in our case it is always the woman on line. The only time trooper looks is when I show him a profile. Yet we get emails all the time saying things like "I'd like to help you please your wife" And I have to refrain from writing back, "well when I divorce my husband and marry a woman I will keep you in mind"
PG |
||
Louisville KY |
Username hidden
(14017 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Columbia MO |
Username hidden
(7 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
I always appreciate it when the woman writes first. Then I know her other half isn't pushing her into it, and she, in fact, really exists. In the end we end up talking to both, but primarily its her and me. There have been too many times where we realized the woman wasn't involved or interested.
|
||
Washington DC |
Username hidden
(20 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Denham Springs LA |
Username hidden
(62 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Howell MI |
Username hidden
(1615 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
kickenback, that's one reason we have several public pics of us together, and we have the private one showing faces and sometimes a bit more skin available to those we are interested in.
We are not interested in communication with couple profiles that have 0 pictures of the male half either within the profile or attached to an email. In my years on this website (most of which I was a SF) 9 times out of 10 if indeed it was a real couple, usually the male was dog ass ugly. So in our book, no photos of the male are a big red flag. Shelly |
||
Canton MS |
Username hidden
(2764 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
ROFLMAO
|
||
Mcallen TX |
Username hidden
(5616 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Oh! so they're like k9's? they sniff each other's butts?
|
||
Colts Neck NJ |
Username hidden
(12313 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Smoke signals, Sed. Smoke signals. lol
|
||
Mcallen TX |
Username hidden
(5616 post)
|
||
1 to 10 of 31
End
|
TOPIC: Women talking
|