SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs
Busy Swingers Forum
Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
Create A Free Account|
|
TOPIC: Using statistics for risk reduction
|
|
|
Start
91 to 100 of 147
End
|
User Details are only visible to members.
|
I think where the "camps," if you will, are split is the degree of risk.
There are some barebackers on here who seem to be saying that since you are accepting some risk (by not using a dental dam, for example), you should accept more risk by not using condoms. Everyone decides their own level of risk. I don't see what some people get so upset about... |
||
Lakeside CA |
Username hidden
(15713 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
lol @ KindDraggon,
Unfortunately we are in a risky lifestyle as swingers. And most don't glove up or dental dam up during oral. I think that's why Caretakers started this thread as a way to help with risk. We can never be too safe. |
||
Highland CA |
Username hidden
(184 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
I think dishonesty has been a repeating theme, probably for very good reason.
If someone is dishonest about their sexual preferences, condom use, or anything else for that matter, there is a good chance they are dishonest about getting tested or the results. (I would love to know the probabilities) It comes back to the question, do you think pressure on honesty would improve safety for everyone? How far do you think the pressure should go? Should dishonesty be highlighted and at what point is it "blacklisting," or "kissing and telling?" |
||
Harmony FL |
Username hidden
(192 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Kunkletown PA |
Username hidden
(2981 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Kind dragon,
Another stated Barebackers are dangerous, selfish, & actions are stupid. Our point was that if this is true, honest Barebackers would only themselves be all the above to themselves. Not affecting people that do use protection because they are not dangerous or selfish to us because we do not engage in sexual activity with them. |
||
Highland CA |
Username hidden
(184 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"People should tell their doctors what all they do. We have from day one. By what we have found, doctors don't even blink when you tell them you swing. They have been very understanding and helpful."
i tried to do this twice just recently and couldn't utter the words. i think it's so wise!! ... maybe it's just because we are so new to ls and i will get braver with time. *fingers crossed |
||
Kunkletown PA |
Username hidden
(2981 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
oh i'm so confused as usual... lol
"But that would mean the other is a barebacker too. " i didnt get what you were asking and then i realized if the 'she' partner of a barebacker (the "barebackee", lol) IS totally fine with taking the same risks, how does that effect the 'condom only users'? is that the question? (i dont have an answer/opinion, i'm still trying to figure out the question...) |
||
Kunkletown PA |
Username hidden
(2981 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
We think Barebackers would open up and express themselves freely if they were not burned at the stake. Honestly we believe there are more Barebackers out there than we think. But if they weren't flamed at, more would speak up and give their thoughts on the subject.
|
||
Highland CA |
Username hidden
(184 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"Calling Barebackers stupid or stating their actions are stupid"
We think it's the same. They are called Barebackers for a reason and their action is included in their name label. |
||
Highland CA |
Username hidden
(184 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
But that would mean the other is a barebacker too.
|
||
Highland CA |
Username hidden
(184 post)
|
||
|
Start
91 to 100 of 147
End
|
TOPIC: Using statistics for risk reduction
|