I never said I supported it. However if it were so bogus the supreme court wouldn't have held on to it for so long. I'm as patriotic as the next man but not to the point of blind acceptance. The major indictment is how the food industry and the pharmaceutical industry are in bed together.

FYI...this is not a muslim theory.

"@seduction the US has had a patented cure for years TETRASIL (sp) a black lawyer took the cure years ago and has sued the US government,past and current presidents for the creation,manufacturing and distribution of the HIV virus. It was finally head by the supreme court last year after many years. BoydgravesDOTCOM"

Oh give me a break...I'll be the first to admit that the US Government has seriously fucked some things up, but I don't go for a conspiracy theory that they created the HIV virus and exposed 3rd world countries to it, and then US citizens.

Good question. I don't think all people will...but I think if you ask most will. I met a SF on a lifestyle site that was extremely sexually aggressive. During my phone screening I asked specifically "do have have any known stds?" she said yes...now I didn't ask how she contracted it as that was all I needed to know...the good ole YES.

That's why I'm clear in my profile....I'm not in a rush. You might miss something speeding!!!!!

I addressed the OP in that I don't believe HIV is in the cat of diseases as STD and no I don't know of anyone that contracted STD

FYI a patent doesn't imply efficacy BTW.

@seduction the US has had a patented cure for years TETRASIL (sp) a black lawyer took the cure years ago and has sued the US government,past and current presidents for the creation,manufacturing and distribution of the HIV virus. It was finally head by the supreme court last year after many years. BoydgravesDOTCOM

I have followed the science of Dr Peter Duesberg, one of the most internationally decorated and highly acclaimed scientist on the planet since the 90s on the subject. Other important POVS and dissidents are David Crowe and Charles Geshekter both brilliant scholarly minds. I just checked and thanks to technology they can all be youtubed.

Ahhhhh now were talking. We have to explain the many offspring that the disease doesn't pass to. My major point is how does one even know that they are HIV positive with no universally accepted protocol and the multitude of false positives.

I guess we should call it a Bodily Fuid Trasmitted Disease then, to be more specific then. Then again, not all transfers of bodily fluids have a high risk. Call it what you like...it still stands to reason that the top 3 ways to contract HIV are sexual contact, contaminated blood transfer, and geneticly in an offspring born to a parent with the virus.