115
Question to all you Bare Back only folks : Swingers Discussion 11760310831
Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

HELP
FORUMSGeneral DiscussionsSafe SexQuestion to all you Bare Back only folks
TOPIC: Question to all you Bare Back only folks
GoTo Page: Less ... 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 ... More 
Start   831 to 840 of 936   End
User Details are only visible to members.
Circumcision as a means to reduce the risk of disease...I've heard it all now.

Portsmouth OH
Username hidden
(954 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Ignorance is always dangerous.

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(16808 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Sigh, I was hoping you'd display more of the Licks and Nibbles side and less of the illogical.

Enosburg Falls VT
Username hidden
(972 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Perfect, I'm glad you are done. Your wrongs rang out.

Licks, it is you who have inveighed the hysteria of personal attack. I've answered each time you've said it can't be so with evidence that it can indeed be so. You haven't debated that evidence. Calling it wrong is not a debate or a discussion. Calling me dangerous is a personal attack and deals not at all with the discussion or the information.

Enosburg Falls VT
Username hidden
(972 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
DandJ

I'm done. You're completely wrong, but go on believing what you want. I'll continue thinking you're uneducated.

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(16808 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
At least three studies have been done on the reduction of risk circumcision affords, and one was in Europe. Each found the same reduction, about 50%. Hopefully there will be more studies done to make more firm these conclusions, but already the rate of circumcision is being increased in Africa as a cheap risk reduction. Look at a map of Africa that details the general rate of circumcision geographically along with the rate of HIV, and you'll notice an inverse relationship. The higher the prevalence of circumcision, the lower the HIV infection rate. If you hold your mind closed to the latest discoveries in HIV risk reduction, it is you who are hindering effective HIV prevention.

Enosburg Falls VT
Username hidden
(972 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Lick, it makes me wonder what is the most dangerous information I've posted, that condoms reduce the relative risks of HIV 90%??? That HPV infects most sexually active adults??? That Herpes infects most adults??? That circumcision reduces the risk of HIV 50%???

I think the most dangerous posts are those claiming that information is dangerous. And that only they are the Gods of information. Also dangerous are those who feel free to personally bash posters who argue with figures and logic. If you disagree, disagree! But personal bashing is pitiful.

Enosburg Falls VT
Username hidden
(972 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Nine, there are many ways to reduce the risk of getting infected with HIV. We are not talking about the risk of spreading HIV because I am not infected and assume you are not also. If I were to become infected there would be zero risk of spreading it, since I would not be swinging at all.

Condoms are only one way to reduce risks. Another is to reduce the number of your partners. Third is to be circumcized. Fourth is to get a vasectomy. Fifth is to screen those you play with very well. The most effective way to reduce risk is to not swing at all. Since you are not doing that, you are not using the most effective means to reduce risk of infection.

Enosburg Falls VT
Username hidden
(972 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Perfect, this is the second time I've explained your misreading of the study on condom effectiveness. The study was of the relative risk between wearing condoms and not wearing them. Condoms reduced the risk by 90%, or ten times. Reduced whatever risk both faced. Relative, not actual risk. It said nothing about the actual statistical risk of fucking an infected person. Rather it said that wearing condoms reduced whatever that risk was by 90% over wearing nothing.

The other, completely separate study delineated the actual risk of fucking an infected person bareback at one in 200, or 0.5%. So using that figure, condoms theoretically would reduce that to one in 2,000 or 0.05%.

Enosburg Falls VT
Username hidden
(972 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Well DandJ it seems you believe that study and do not mind taking 'the risk' were others do not. Some might say people like yourself that prefer barebacking will always keep the STD's including spreading AIDS around, if only condoms were used more often, we can slow the spread of AIDS and STD's. Unless you disagree ?

Baltimore MD
Username hidden
(2085 posts)
GoTo Page: Less ... 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 ... More 
Start   831 to 840 of 936   End
TOPIC: Question to all you Bare Back only folks