SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs
Busy Swingers Forum
Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
Create A Free Account|
|
TOPIC: Question to all you Bare Back only folks
|
|
|
Start
131 to 140 of 930
End
|
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Since condom users effectively bareback 1 of 10 times fucking with a condom on, Perfect maintains with ineffable wit that condom user barebacking is different in risk from barebacker barebacking. Since I can't benefit from Perfect's secret inside knowledge (is it like the Bottom Line's insider's secrets newsletter?) I'm from that old school where barebacking is barebacking whether done by condom failure or actual intention.
Oh Emperor Perfect, if only you'd bless me with your magnificence of knowledge and logic and show me the error of my clueless ways! |
||
Enosburg Falls VT |
Username hidden
(969 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Perfect, a truly bold response and so cutting!
Seems the mobsters are more interested in blocking than discussion. If only they could block those with views different than their own, especially in this horrifying thread about barebacking, then their cute little clique could get busy with the really important stuff and not deal with actual statistics, reason, math, studies, risks, and other dull, boring drivel. Sigh...I'm left with the wonder words of Perfect. |
||
Enosburg Falls VT |
Username hidden
(969 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
I see...good info..thanks!
|
||
Spring TX |
Username hidden
(1865 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
I saw a tool on another site,, you can block people from responding to your posts. I think that would go far in weeding out those that come into forum discussions just to screw with people they have crushes on or dont like and dont have anything useful to add to the discussion ..It has a block member from writting me, Instant messaging me, and from responding to posts in forums written by you. what do yall think of a tool like that on this site, I feel the forums here is used more than the forums on that specific site..
|
||
Spring TX |
Username hidden
(1865 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Exactly. Its possible this is the only outlet for them and saying things that make no sense makes it a constant conversation for them to be able to have with someone.
|
||
Spring TX |
Username hidden
(1865 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
WRONG!
You really are clueless |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14772 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Perfect, your claim has nothing to do with me or barebackers. Your claim is that the incidence of HiV in the swingers barebackers fuck is greater than the incidence of HIV in the swingers condom users fuck.
Due to the failure rate of condoms, condom users bareback 1 out of 10 times even with condoms on. Your claim is that condom users fuck swingers with less risk of HIV than the swingers barebackers fuck, so even during that 1 in 10 times barebacking, their barebacking is safer. You offer no evidence. Bareback swingers and condom swingers fuck the same pool of swingers. |
||
Enosburg Falls VT |
Username hidden
(969 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"That claim requires the assumption that condom users always use condoms and their play partners always use condoms and so on down the line. That chain of assumptions is common sense??? "
Wrong again. That claim holds up with the simple fact that barebackers like you NEVER, or seldom wear condoms. duh. |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14772 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
A Perfect claim to common sense! Negative judgements up the ass, yes!Reactions, name calling, big fat ego, yes, common sense, no.
I've posted many times that the risk of a condom user fucking an infected person is very small. Same for a barebacker. Perfect claims that condom users face a smaller risk of fucking an infected person than barebackers but offers no evidence. That claim requires the assumption that condom users always use condoms and their play partners always use condoms and so on down the line. That chain of assumptions is common sense??? |
||
Enosburg Falls VT |
Username hidden
(969 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Ok lets just say that men can fly..answer me this....
Two trains 150 miles apart are traveling toward each other along the same track. The first train goes 60 miles per hour; the second train rushes along at 90 miles per hour. A guy without a condom is hovering just above the nose of the first train. he flies from the first train to the second train, turns around immediately, flies back to the first train, and turns around again. He goes on flying back and forth between the two trains until they collide. If the condomless mans speed is 120 miles per hour, how far will it travel? |
||
Augusta NJ |
Username hidden
(16075 post)
|
||
|
Start
131 to 140 of 930
End
|
TOPIC: Question to all you Bare Back only folks
|