155

|
|
TOPIC: Will we see this on the MSM
|
|
|
Start
11 to 20 of 165
End
|
User Details are only visible to members.
|
one last time.
You CLEARLY 'alluded' to Louisiana. My comments your questioning DIRECTLY follow your attempt to link the 2 cases. My 2 subsequent posts are CLEARLY in reference to Louisiana. That is CONTEXT genius. If you don't get it at this point, then you're too dumb to get it. |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14584 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"You've had about a dozen chances to point out ANYTHING in there that mentions Louisiana in ANY way. Where is it? Quote any sentence. Twelve strikes and you're out."
Still waiting. Feel free to add any context you think is important. It doesn't change the fact that your post is all about Slater, and nothing about Louisiana. You say the post was to point out differences between the two cases. What differences? If it were so, you would have shown us all by now. Strike 13. |
||
San Quentin CA |
Username hidden
(8604 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
First
"I didn't mention the Louisiana case here; I asked how the simple burglary at issue in THIS thread turned into a violent encounter " Then ""The rest of the post was an allusion to a debate Perf and I have been having in other threads about laws prohibiting gun possession, and an offhand observation that the Slater case was a good example supporting a point I had made in that debate. " I think Fun might be Al Gore. |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14584 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
hahaha....crickets
I love slamming you with your own bullshit. |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14584 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
My second post
""What the fuck was this guy doing on the street? It's OK, just let him out and make it against the law for him to have a gun." You don't get the sarcasm???????????????????? That's STILL mocking your comparison to the Louisiana case. |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14584 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Why don't you try putting it in context? Put up YOUR post, which was CLEARLY alluding to Louisiana according to BOTH of us, Then put up my next 3 posts.
Stop with the soundbites. Do you understand 'context'? I think you do, but it's how you spin stuff so you can lie about it. |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14584 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
San Quentin CA |
Username hidden
(8604 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
And you said it was a simple burglary.
It's not my fault you're incompetent. |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14584 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"but still maintaining my response was only about Slater."
It was. The whole thing. It mentions him by name, throughout. You've had about a dozen chances to point out ANYTHING in there that mentions Louisiana in ANY way. Where is it? Quote any sentence. Twelve strikes and you're out. |
||
San Quentin CA |
Username hidden
(8604 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"Still no explanation, but finally an admission that any reference to Louisiana in the first post "may not have been clear." lol. "
Stop with the soundbites. I said it may not have been clear to YOU. I even capitalized YOU because it's IMPORTANT. You're pathetic. |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14584 post)
|
||
Start
11 to 20 of 165
End
|
TOPIC: Will we see this on the MSM
|