125
We have an AMERICAN CITIZEN ON AMERICAN SOIL accused of Terrorism : Swingers Discussion 2205811032
Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

HELP
FORUMSGeneral DiscussionsPoliticsWe have an AMERICAN CITIZEN ON AMERICAN SOIL accused of Terrorism
TOPIC: We have an AMERICAN CITIZEN ON AMERICAN SOIL accused of Terrorism
GoTo Page: Less ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... More 
Start   32 to 41 of 366   End
User Details are only visible to members.
hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(17104 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
If I recall, Heller specifically rejected the "rational relation" test (sometimes called the "reasonableness" test) as a standard of review.

Beyond that, I'm not going to go further into a legal debate with someone who is manifestly unable to keep up. Carry on.

Belle Chasse LA
Username hidden
(10938 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Do you play chess? lmao

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(17104 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
"Passing a gun law that is subject to judicial review is very different than advocating that this kid be shipped off somewhere as an enemy combatant, specifically in an attempt to avoid judicial involvement. "

Sure, One right is more important than another...even though it's the 2nd right specifically mentioned.

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(17104 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
If I recall, the word 'reasonable' was thrown around quite a bit in Heller.

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(17104 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Ever hear of the "strict scrutiny" test?

Belle Chasse LA
Username hidden
(10938 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Ever hear of the '“reasonableness” test?

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(17104 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
When some statute burdens a fundamental (constitutional) right, courts don't use a "reasonableness" standard of review; they scrutinize the law much more strictly. 

Any gun restriction can be challenged in the courts; people who remember high school civics have heard of checks and balances, separation of powers, etc.  

Passing a gun law that is subject to judicial review is very different than advocating that this kid be shipped off somewhere as an enemy combatant, specifically in an attempt to avoid judicial involvement. 

Belle Chasse LA
Username hidden
(10938 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Well I could have given you the Spin-a-hoy, and kept pointing out that you don't care what Bloomberg thinks...you don't care that we have to change our interpretation of the Constitution.

:-)

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(17104 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
OK correction: I don't VALUE what he thinks.

Chesapeake VA
Username hidden
(19799 posts)
GoTo Page: Less ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... More 
Start   32 to 41 of 366   End
TOPIC: We have an AMERICAN CITIZEN ON AMERICAN SOIL accused of Terrorism