Voter Suppression in Pennsylvania: Swingers Discussion 208627

SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

TOPIC: Voter Suppression in Pennsylvania

Created by: Z_Z_Krewe Original Starting post for this thread:
In response to the new requirement that voters have government-issued identification, the Pennsylvania Department of State announced that 758,000 residents may be at risk of not having the required identification. In fact, the Pennsylvania Majority Leader announced his motives for Voter ID: to deliver Pennsylvania for Governor Romney. The new law was passed despite the state's acknowledgement that it knows of no instances of in-person voter fraud in Pennsylvania. For that matter, there is scant evidence of such voting fraud across the nation. The Pennsylvania law has been upheld by the courts, though its impact on the election in that state is unpredictable. Support your local GOPoopery in elections by defending the Republic-con Party's need to suppress votes in Pennsylvania.

Created by: Z_Z_Krewe
Original Starting post for this thread:

In response to the new requirement that voters have government-issued identification, the Pennsylvania Department of State announced that 758,000 residents may be at risk of not having the required identification. In fact, the Pennsylvania Majority Leader announced his motives for Voter ID: to deliver Pennsylvania for Governor Romney. The new law was passed despite the state's acknowledgement that it knows of no instances of in-person voter fraud in Pennsylvania. For that matter, there is scant evidence of such voting fraud across the nation. The Pennsylvania law has been upheld by the courts, though its impact on the election in that state is unpredictable.

Support your local GOPoopery in elections by defending the Republic-con Party's need to suppress votes in Pennsylvania.

GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6

1 to 10 of 55

End

User Details are only visible to members.	The Dems earned the vast majority of that money in 2008 the same way as this time, millions upon millions of small donations. 10 million small contributors as of last week in fact. Romney sticks to the tried and true method of bending over and spreading his ass cheeks for billionaires like himself. So dependent on large donors is he that he has maxed out the limits on many and small donations from ordinary Americans has been slow to flow (suck a little harder Mittens!) One buys his election with hard work, the other by a night in the sheets with the money left on the dresser. Which one is more legitimate?
East Fishkill NY			Username hidden (2777 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Robert, Our views tilt more libertarian. Fiscally conservative, socially liberal. Odd how the Democrats today would consider JFK too conservative and the GOP would consider Reagan too liberal.
Rossford OH			Username hidden (50 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	AZQT, 2008 had plenty of voter fraud and voter intimidation. ACORN and the Black Panthers for example. The Dems and Repubs have both fucked the country over, they both have had an active hand in the till.
Rossford OH			Username hidden (50 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	FNM: Aren't you a conservative? Buying the election (or anything) should be all fair in your ideals.
Hazle Township PA			Username hidden (5112 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	FNM So then you would agree obama was responsible for the real voter fraud in 2008, when owebama bought the general election. Remember when obama said he was using public funds, then flip flopped? The democrats have fucked the entire country (again). ...or is this one of those posts that when the dems spend big bucks it is ok, but a different therory when the GOP does?
Peoria AZ			Username hidden (2292 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Nothing wrong with having to prove your identity in order to vote. The real voter fraud this election cycle has already been done by the GOP when it allowed Romney to buy the nomination and rigged the primaries against Ron Paul. The GOP has fucked itself (again).
Rossford OH			Username hidden (50 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	FJep: And the sccotus was wrong in his views. He's human, well forgive him. Don't try calling yourself loyal to freedom if you support denying freedom to people you don't like.
Hazle Township PA			Username hidden (5112 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	"I have some ocean front property here in AZ to sell you..." Hey, if the big one comes along you might just make him a very rich man.
Cape Coral FL			Username hidden (4080 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Bush v. Gore (2000) "The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States." SCOTUS
Sanford NC			Username hidden (18900 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	The Constitution never explicitly ensures the right to vote, as it does the right to speech, for example. It does require that Representatives be chosen and Senators be elected by "the People," and who comprises "the People" has been expanded by the aforementioned amendments several times. Aside from these requirements, though, the qualifications for voters are left to the states. And as long as the qualifications do not conflict with anything in the Constitution, that right can be withheld. For example, in Texas, persons declared mentally incompetent and felons currently in prison or on probation are denied the right to vote. It is interesting to note that though the 26th Amendment requires that 18-year-olds must be able to vote, states can allow persons younger than 18 to vote, if they chose to.
Pittsburgh PA			Username hidden (14772 post)

GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6

1 to 10 of 55

End

TOPIC: Voter Suppression in Pennsylvania

		HELP
FORUMS: General Discussions: Politics: Voter Suppression in Pennsylvania