Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

HELP
FORUMS General Discussions Politics The significance of county Sheriffs defying the Federal Government
TOPIC: The significance of county Sheriffs defying the Federal Government
GoTo Page: Less ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Start   251 to 260 of 272   End
User Details are only visible to members.
pp

Stop taking soundbites. You sound like every other libtard, and I'm not quite ready to put you in that group. Here's the rest of what Scalia had to say........

"We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those “in common use at the time.”… We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of “dangerous and unusual weapons.”…

IIt may be objected that if weapons that are most useful in military service — M-16 rifles and the like — may be banned, then the Second Amendment right is completely detached from the prefatory clause. But as we have said, the conception of the militia at the time of the Second Amendment’s ratification was the body of all citizens capable of military service, who would bring the sorts of lawful weapons that they possessed at home to militia duty. It may well be true today that a militia, to be as effective as militias in the 18th century, would require sophisticated arms that are highly unusual in society at large. Indeed, it may be true that no amount of small arms could be useful against modern-day bombers and tanks. But the fact that modern developments have limited the degree of fit between the prefatory clause and the protected right cannot change our interpretation of the right.

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(17464 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Vacl4 never claimed the AR- 15 was an automatic weapon never claimed I owned an M-16 The trigger I described are accurate Why do you embarrass yourself with your lies, misquotes and ignorance?

Rosemont IL
Username hidden
(3844 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Very easy to make that statement an AR-15 is not an automatic weapon case closed. Once again you make false statements to suit your view point. Oh and how about those triggers?? How about the rifles you claim to own?? What's wrong telling so many lies you can't remember what you have said??

Berryville VA
Username hidden
(1750 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
...for the record, I don't think Obama will get his federal assault weapons ban...THIS time...for now we will have to settle for States banning them, imposing still penalties for violations, and wait till 2014 16 or at at the latest, 2020 to get a federal ban...like all things progressive...all you need to do is be patient

Rosemont IL
Username hidden
(3844 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
“We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of ‘dangerous and unusual weapons."

Think you can make the legal case that an AR-15 or a Bushmaster doesn't fall under that criteria? if so, you're dreaming

Rosemont IL
Username hidden
(3844 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Pp he wrote M-16

Berryville VA
Username hidden
(1750 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
"PM69 Read Justice Scalias majority opinion in Heller v US "

If read it. Please provide a quote, or page and Paragraph number in support of your statements.

You do know how to do that, right?

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(17464 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Oh sorry..I see you have...clearly you just didn't understand it. Assault weapons do not make the cut, Scalia has been clear on this both in his opinion letter and since...and he is THE most conservative member of the SCOTUS

Rosemont IL
Username hidden
(3844 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
PM69 Read Justice Scalias majority opinion in Heller v US

Rosemont IL
Username hidden
(3844 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Perfect, We will not get an answer for PP he is so full of shit. He spews so many lies he believes them him self.

Berryville VA
Username hidden
(1750 posts)
GoTo Page: Less ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Start   251 to 260 of 272   End
TOPIC: The significance of county Sheriffs defying the Federal Government