125
The significance of county Sheriffs defying the Federal Government : Swingers Discussion 216157101
Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

HELP
FORUMSGeneral DiscussionsPoliticsThe significance of county Sheriffs defying the Federal Government
TOPIC: The significance of county Sheriffs defying the Federal Government
Created by: PartyPerks847
Original Starting post for this thread:
Once might think these 12 sheriffs are just some yahoos giving their trailer park constituents some warm fuzzies, and then when the time comes and their hand are tied, they can say “At least I tried” If only it were that simple For reasons I choose not to reveal for the sake of privacy, I have had some experience with Right Wing extremists. I am not talking about the right wing whacko next door, I am talking bunker building, food and water hoarding, militia organizing, full blown domestic terrorist whackos Go to page ONE of any of their doctrine, be it the Posse Comiatus, Council of Conservative Citizens, Aryan nation, The Order, or any of the others, and you will see in BOLD print…”The County Government is the only constitutionally sanctioned law enforcement entity in the US” (Which of course is categorically absurd) So you see, this was not a spontaneous reaction from the treasonous sheriffs, this has been harbored for decades. The GOOD NEWS is, these whacko right groups claim they had THOUSANDS of sheriffs in their ranks, turns out, it was only 12

GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... More 
 1 to 10 of 272   End
User Details are only visible to members.
" The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.

An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it . . .

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one.

An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law.

Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. "

-- Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177. (late 2nd Ed. Section 256)

Sanford NC
Username hidden
(19410 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Law enforcement has always had the option of which laws to enforce or not enforce. They are not legally bound to do anything unless a law specifically orders them to take action, such as abuse laws. They never have been duty bound to enforce federal laws, and federal agents are not duty bound to enforce local and state laws, in fact they are in most states operating as private citizens when they do and lose their qualified immunity. Police do not even have to protect your sorry ass, they can legally watch if they so feel. And SCOTUS backs it all up, get over it.

Sanford NC
Username hidden
(19410 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Just so you know fool, I think ANYONE who breaks the law is WRONG. I would think all citizens would feel the same, no matter color,gender,religion, or political thoughts. I thought both Nixon and Clinton should have done time. As for states not having to follow fed law we can see this is playing out well with states letting stores sell pot, now tell me that alright with you to? You are fast with the name calling but not long on the thought process I see!

Keller TX
Username hidden
(555 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
"I am so glad to hear people say it is ok to pick and choose which laws they will obey, such a WONDERFUL example to set for our youth. "

Why are you not upset that Holder ordered states to not enforce federal laws, AND the SCOTUS backed up Holder.

Sorry Bub, but the local and state authorities not only do not have to enforce federal laws they now can't.

Doncha just lub the liberal stupidity...

Sanford NC
Username hidden
(19410 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I can remember a guy I knew went to Canada to avoid going into the military, he didn't believe in killing or wars, that was almost 40 yrs ago during the VietNam War.I told him that was wrong then, is it right for anyone not to obey the law, just because you disagree with it? We are suppose to be a country with rules and laws, I told my son when he got busted with pot the same thing, I get it you think your right, but the law says no and he did 6 months in a bootcamp for minors in the state of Oregon.

Keller TX
Username hidden
(555 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
JOANNAJIM, they got the idea from the president.

Spring Branch TX
Username hidden
(323 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
It happens everyday. The law is not always enforced. Just because you don't like the fact that they do not want to enforce something that you want them to now it's a problem.

Berryville VA
Username hidden
(1750 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I am so glad to hear people say it is ok to pick and choose which laws they will obey, such a WONDERFUL example to set for our youth.

Keller TX
Username hidden
(555 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I heard this verbally from someone I know who is a member of Oath Keepers. His statement was: 300 Sheriffs have pledged not to enforce any Federal Law which would violate 2A.

Tulare CA
Username hidden
(1880 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Every sheriff in Florida pledges to protect Second Amendment rights

GUN RIGHTS FEBRUARY 19, 2013 BY: JENNIFER CRUZ

Every single sheriff in the state of Florida supports Second Amendment rights.

On Sunday, Feb. 17, Watch Dog Wire reported that they received an email from Constitutional Sheriffs stating that all 67 sheriffs in the counties of Florida have signed a pledge declaring that they not only support the Second Amendment, but that they will protect the right of the people to keep and bear arms. 67, that’s every single county in the state.

Florida has become the first state to receive 100% support from every sheriff, which makes a huge statement opposing tyrannical acts against the United States Constitution. A statement that many other states are most likely soon to follow.

Perhaps it’s a bit ironic that Florida is officially the first state with 100% support for the Second Amendment, when it was also a state that favored Obama over Romney this past election year. Although they are both anti-gun… or so-called pro-gun, depending on which state they are currently seeking support from.

The Little Rock Gun Rights Examiner commends the sheriffs of Florida for their decision to not only show their support for the right to keep and bear arms, but for pledging to protect that right for all of the American people.

Berryville VA
Username hidden
(1750 posts)
GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... More 
 1 to 10 of 272   End
TOPIC: The significance of county Sheriffs defying the Federal Government