The Newest Target of the Politically Correct : Swingers Discussion 209368

SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

TOPIC: The Newest Target of the Politically Correct

Created by: SLOtowner Original Starting post for this thread:
The latest PC target is fat adults and their children? The latest target for bullying by the political correct? But, hey! It's okay, because it's in the best interest of: The Nation (Socialist bullshit) The KIDS. (ain't it always about "the KIDS"?) The parents. "HEY YOU FAT, UGLY PIG ... OINK OINK! " No more BBW, I suppose. Now it will be BFP's (big fat pigs) or maybe BUW's (big ugly women). Maybe they'll just put them in camps and starve them down to an acceptable weight, as mandated by brako and the new world fat Nazis. While the ads (RIGHT NOW, anyway) are somewhat benign, it won't be long before the will be ratcheted up as attacks on on both adults and children. The fact is, it is no one's business what a person consumes in this country and the "best interests" of the "country" or the "people" be damned. That is National Socialism (it's recognizable name is "Nazi"). That's where this is heading. Read this (below) and watch the ad in the article. What do you think? Here is one article: "Shaming Parents to Fight Childhood Obesity Is A Necessary Evil" Claire McCarthy, MD link: huffingtonpost . com/claire-mccarthy-md/childhood-obesity_b_1916419.html START If we really want to decrease childhood obesity, do you know what we need to do? Fight parental obesity. I'm serious. We've known for a while that what puts a child at biggest risk of being obese is having an obese parent, and just recently a study was released that said the same thing. Having an obese parent is a bigger risk factor than watching tons of TV or having a bad diet or never exercising. If we could get parents to a better weight, the researchers said, we could cut childhood obesity in half. That's why ads like these from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota make sense: (Blue Cross Ad VIDEO) ..... (It is embedded in the web article.) .......ARTICLE CONTINUES IN NEXT REPLY......

Created by: SLOtowner
Original Starting post for this thread:

The latest PC target is fat adults and their children?  The latest target for bullying by the political correct?

But, hey!  It's okay, because it's in the best interest of:
The Nation (Socialist bullshit)
The KIDS.  (ain't it always about "the KIDS"?)
The parents.

"HEY YOU FAT, UGLY PIG ... OINK OINK!  "

No more BBW, I suppose.  Now it will be BFP's (big fat pigs) or maybe BUW's (big ugly women).  Maybe they'll just put them in camps and starve them down to an acceptable weight, as mandated by brako and the new world fat Nazis.  

While the ads (RIGHT NOW, anyway)  are somewhat benign, it won't be long before the will be ratcheted up as attacks on on both adults and children.  The fact is, it is no one's business what a person consumes in this country and the "best interests" of the "country" or the "people" be damned.  That is National Socialism (it's recognizable name is "Nazi").    That's where this is heading. 

Read this (below) and watch the ad in the article.  

What do you think?

Here is one article:
"Shaming Parents to Fight Childhood Obesity Is A Necessary Evil" 
Claire McCarthy, MD
link:
huffingtonpost . com/claire-mccarthy-md/childhood-obesity_b_1916419.html

START
If we really want to decrease childhood obesity, do you know what we need to do?

Fight parental obesity.

I'm serious. We've known for a while that what puts a child at biggest risk of being obese is having an obese parent, and just recently a study was released that said the same thing. Having an obese parent is a bigger risk factor than watching tons of TV or having a bad diet or never exercising. If we could get parents to a better weight, the researchers said, we could cut childhood obesity in half.

That's why ads like these from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota make sense:

(Blue Cross Ad VIDEO) ..... (It is embedded in the web article.)

.......ARTICLE CONTINUES IN NEXT REPLY......

GoTo Page: 1 2 3

1 to 10 of 22

End

User Details are only visible to members.	Uhhh I think the smart ones did Robert lol.
Maurice LA			Username hidden (3726 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	"But, hey! It's okay, because..." It's not ok because of any of these things. Shame on anyone that thinks so! Want to know what IS ok? When I get the very same porkers screaming at me that they will eat what they damn well please AND that we don't need social safety nets AND they want free heart operations on Medicare when their fat asses get sick from injecting all that garbage food into their mouths. And yet they STILL won't stop over eating... Put the pork chop down and step away from the table! Go walk around the block until you can do it without stopping. Now say it after me: "I'm fat because I can't stop stuffing garbage into my mouth." It's the ONLY reason ANYONE is fat! Now, who's fault is that? Maybe if it stings there is a truth there.....
East Fishkill NY			Username hidden (2772 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Slo: Please try that again, only try using complete sentences and with some kind if substance other than half made references to nazi Germany. Remember what allowed the Nazis to gain power. The preception that the little man didn't matter and the rich becoming a ever smaller number and equally richer than the average joe. Once the scales tip too far into this direction, radicals come out of the wood work to balance the preception scales. They do this not by truly balancing them, but by burning the village down. (look to Germany at the end of WWII. Where there anyone left with any riches?)
Hazle Township PA			Username hidden (4780 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	"Get a real life, before brako and the brownshirts take yours from you." There were posters here saying just that ibefore the '08 election, that there would be "brownshirts" by now. What went wrong?
Cape Coral FL			Username hidden (4080 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Slick, simple answers from one who has absolutely no inkling of how the world works. You don't have to prove that some BIG FAT PIG (remember, ... it is now politically correct to say that) is fat, but it will be more difficult or impossible to prove that someone else's lifestyle has pegged them for execution or as the Direktor of Lifestyle Choices, at the camps, our own Socialist "sorter" Herr Hil puts it, "they'll have to pay more." Camp-speak for being sent to the gas chamber or the Soylent Green processing plant. Get a real life, before brako and the brownshirts take yours from you.
San Luis Obispo CA			Username hidden (1192 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Just: "Really Robert? Ok but what about smokers, drinkers,Drug users? What about them, because theres millions of them on Ins, So please tell me what about allllllllllllllllllllll the other people?" Fair enough of a question, equally simple answer. If you smoke, you pay more. If you use tobacco products like chew, you pay more. (still causes cancer.) If you drink to excessively. (more than a six pack every 2-3 days) You get to pay more. If you are always being injured by sports or other activities and are doing so without following the prescribed safety measures... You get to pay more. Bottom line, if you are doing things which increases the likelihood of further medical problems and aren't taking the precautions needed. (thus safety equipment) you get to pay more. This isn't a liberal idea... It is a conservative one. Liberals would spread the pain across everyone, even if they themselves are careful in what they eat and do.
Hazle Township PA			Username hidden (4780 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Really Robert? Ok but what about smokers, drinkers,Drug users? What about them, because theres millions of them on Ins, So please tell me what about allllllllllllllllllllll the other people? Mickey.
Maurice LA			Username hidden (3726 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Unforeseen benefit of Universal Affordable Care? -- peer pressure to be healthy.
Flat Rock NC			Username hidden (2787 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Just: "Robert if someone who should not have any kind of junk food still does have it knowing they should not. That is their choice and me you and for damn sure the Goverment does not have the right to tell them what they can and cannot do. Its called freedom of choice,,As much as OBAMASS And his click would love to take that away from us,,Well we all know that aint ever gona happen." No one is taking the freedom to do as they please from them... but part of freedom is paying for it. Those who are more heavy (of their own free will) cost insurance companies more. There for to cover the loss, everyone must suffer. How is that fair to me? So if those who want the freedom to eat poorly want to do so... they should be forced to pay for it themselves.
Hazle Township PA			Username hidden (4780 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	I only complain about fat people on Gov't assistance
Pittsburgh PA			Username hidden (14584 post)

GoTo Page: 1 2 3

1 to 10 of 22

End

TOPIC: The Newest Target of the Politically Correct

		HELP
FORUMS: General Discussions: Politics: The Newest Target of the Politically Correct