155

|
|
TOPIC: The 2012 Presidential Debates
|
|
|
Start
51 to 60 of 274
End
|
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Still spinning on the Spending Power of the President????
You insisted that the President is responsible for budget deficits and yet the President had NO authority to spend any money not appropriated by congress. I asked you numerous times for a source on the spending power of the President and you just continue to duck, dodge and run. Bump any threads you'd like. I'll kick your ass in any of them. |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14578 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"Just an insult."
Oh dear, who would ever do such a thing? #SoFuckingFunny |
||
Attica NY |
Username hidden
(8604 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"I know more about the Constitution and the Supreme Court than you'll ever know about anything."
If you really want me to bump those threads again where you made a fool of yourself discussing the Everson case, I can do so. (Maybe by now you have figured out that five justices join in something called the majority opinion, and the others write this thing called the dissent). ====================== I'm assuming from your lack of response that you'd rather not be reminded of your embarrassing display of ignorance, which is fine. I trust this lays to rest your boasting about your legal/constitutional acumen. |
||
Attica NY |
Username hidden
(8604 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"I asked you 27 times for a source on the Spending Power of the President. I guess you have selective memory."
Lol, you just didn't like my answers. Give me a few minutes and by this evening I'll refresh your fading/selective memory. In the meantime, regarding your persistence that Congress can force spending without either Presidential approval or a veto override, can you point out a single penny ever spent that way in our entire history? I didn't think so. |
||
Attica NY |
Username hidden
(8604 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"Lib_Ahoy was responding to your post not tbr's. He was trying to be funny. "
Possibly, but you have to wonder why he made made no response after I called him on it. |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14578 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Lib_Ahoy was responding to your post not tbr's. He was trying to be funny.
|
||
Avondale LA |
Username hidden
(4496 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"Now, you come along and say, "Well, Obama did it, too!" to the China istatement. "
My point wasn't that anybody was right or wrong. My point was you, and those of your political stance, never choose to blame a liberal for the exact same thing. It had nothing to do with justisfying bad behavior. Really makes me wonder why the Cheer-A-hoy had to chirp in with the 'lol' |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14578 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Avondale LA |
Username hidden
(4496 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
The original comment was self explanatory.
Then I explained it. Let's try one more time. You still won't understand, but sometimes I am a glutton for punishment... How many times, when a "libtard" has stated "Well, the Republican did it, too," have you used that line? A dozen if you have used it once... Now, you come along and say, "Well, Obama did it, too!" to the China statement. Now, I await your attempt at explaining that this is a completely different situation... |
||
Lakeside CA |
Username hidden
(15707 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"And once again, when you see that your bullshit is being called out on the merits (or lack), you resort to the ad hominems. Usually a pretty good sign of surrender. "
Just an insult. No different than I've seen you do to Frank. I can't help it that the truth hurts sometimes. |
||
Pittsburgh PA |
Username hidden
(14578 post)
|
||
Start
51 to 60 of 274
End
|
TOPIC: The 2012 Presidential Debates
|