175

|
|
TOPIC: Stand Your Ground Law
|
|
|
Start
101 to 110 of 2775
End
|
User Details are only visible to members.
|
One cannot argue with close minded folks like FJ, just indulge them occasionally to expose their simplemindedness.
|
||
Amherst Canada |
Username hidden
(1700 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Dood, either by law a person is guilty or they are not. And in legal terms there is the presumption of innocence. That means a person is innocent until proven guilty.
You are the one arguing the above is wrong. The above has been a long time legal standard. Only a idiot would think considering the standard of law that a person could not be innocent(by law) after being found not guilty. Take your meds... |
||
Sanford NC |
Username hidden
(18796 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
I know Cpl, it's hilarious!
|
||
Colts Neck NJ |
Username hidden
(12310 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
lawschool.cornell.edu/
Get such a kick out of lying liberals... |
||
Sanford NC |
Username hidden
(18796 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
I honestly can't believe that people are arguing over the semantics between Innocent vs Not Guilty.
Actually, yes I can. It's the political forum which means that no one can agree on anything. Carry on. T |
||
Danville PA |
Username hidden
(1860 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
There is no such entity as Cornell University of law
|
||
Lakeside CA |
Username hidden
(15741 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Dood, I contended that "not guilty" is not the same as innocent.
I never contended that "not guilty" is the same as "guilty." Can you provide a cite that says a "not guilty" is an affirmative finding of innocence? Can you provide a cite that says a "presumption" of innocence is the same thing as a formal finding of innocence? Of course you cannot, because it ain't so. Now back to your chess lesson, pigeon. LOL |
||
Amherst Canada |
Username hidden
(1700 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
But MT you did contend that. Are you now saying someone innocent is guilty?
That you know more than Cornell University of law? |
||
Sanford NC |
Username hidden
(18796 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Are you really?
Why would anyone cite something that they do not contend? Lack of nuance, FJ, typical of simpletons. |
||
Amherst Canada |
Username hidden
(1700 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Still waiting on that cite that says not guilty is actually guilty?
|
||
Sanford NC |
Username hidden
(18796 post)
|
||
Start
101 to 110 of 2775
End
|
TOPIC: Stand Your Ground Law
|