115
SCOTUS Gay Marriage Decisions : Swingers Discussion 224125
Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

HELP
FORUMSGeneral DiscussionsPoliticsSCOTUS Gay Marriage Decisions
TOPIC: SCOTUS Gay Marriage Decisions
Created by: vabeachcouple33
Original Starting post for this thread:
I'm sure opinions will morph a little - mine included - as we look more at the details of the court decisions and think about things a little bit... however, let's give our half-baked thoughts.

What are the implications of these decisions from a political angle? Most people are hailing this as a victory for gay rights, and it seems this really has nothing to do with gay rights at all and is more about setting defining lines about what is and is not the Federal government's role.

It looks on the surface to be a 10th Amendment victory, which I am reflexively inclined to celebrate. However, this seems to fly in the face of 10th Amendment defeats such as the ACA decision.

So what is the court up to, here? Are they actually defending the 10th Amendment, or are they going along with ideological lines with what is politically popular?

GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
 1 to 10 of 87   End
User Details are only visible to members.
Funny, I got that from your first post.

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(16841 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I was mostly just grumbling about how the Feds often just resort to the Commerce Clause to do whatever they want. Don't worry about it.

Land O Lakes FL
Username hidden
(19141 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Just because a law (or regulation) doesn't run afoul of the Commerce Clause doesn't mean it passes muster on other constitutional challenges. For example, the commerce clause clearly would give Congress the power to regulate interstate media conglomerates; but a content-based law infringing those entities' First Amendment rights wouldn't be upheld just because there was nothing excessive from a Commerce Clause angle.

Belle Chasse LA
Username hidden
(10815 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
<strong>Thats funny becaue Maany states are opting totally out of Abamacare.</strong>

Rayne LA
Username hidden
(4875 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
And yes I appreciate that Sotomayor gave the injunction. Good for her.

I think ultimately the decision will be overturned, but we'll see. If it stands, it effectively bulldozes all state regulations on the matter.

Land O Lakes FL
Username hidden
(19141 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I didn't word that very well. I meant - I'm surprised the Feds couldn't throw together some kind of Commerce Clause argument whch could be used to steamroll over everything else when it comes to justifying their getting involved in everything.

I still probably didn't word that well. Forgive me... my brain is still not functioning very well....

Land O Lakes FL
Username hidden
(19141 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
<strong>A lot of States are finally realizing that they do not answer to the Fed, Government,</strong>

<strong>Mickey.</strong>

Rayne LA
Username hidden
(4875 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
"Btw, this is the second injunction Sotomayor has granted to conservatives in the last week. Activist. "

Maybe the Times Square ball drop thing didn't enhance her popularity enough.

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(16841 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
"but I don't get it. "

Seems to happen quite a bit.

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(16841 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Btw, this is the second injunction Sotomayor has granted to conservatives in the last week. Activist.

Belle Chasse LA
Username hidden
(10815 posts)
GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
 1 to 10 of 87   End
TOPIC: SCOTUS Gay Marriage Decisions