165
Republican Senators rejected a United Nations treaty : Swingers Discussion 2130651021
Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

HELP
FORUMSGeneral DiscussionsPoliticsRepublican Senators rejected a United Nations treaty
TOPIC: Republican Senators rejected a United Nations treaty
GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Start   21 to 30 of 46   End
User Details are only visible to members.
Did you, or did you not read the treaty? It doesn't appear that you did.

Allenhurst NJ
Username hidden
(16378 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Yeah, because UN sanctions have worked so well in the past..."

Sometimes they do, I for one, would hate to see the US sanctioned by the signatories to the treaty.

Allenhurst NJ
Username hidden
(16378 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
"Wrong, had the US signed up to the treaty, the only time UN law would not override US law, if the US law is more protective of the rights of those with disabilities."

That is not what the treaty says. And, as with all of the other human rights treaties we have signed (International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and others), the treaties provisions have no effect unless codified by US law.

Lakeside CA
Username hidden
(17344 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
"Hmmm sanctions to start with?"

Yeah, because UN sanctions have worked so well in the past...

;-)

Lakeside CA
Username hidden
(17344 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Exactly, this is exactly what you see here, a bunch of lower IQ liberals who heard sound bytes and are jumping at another opportunity to vilify and paint the Right as negatively as they possibly can.

Reality though, is that neither Robert, nor Sardukar have read the treaty, furthermore, I'm willing to bet, that even if they attempted, Bobby doesn't have what it takes to comprehend it, and Sardukar is going to need a dictionary to help him out, perhaps at some point he can figure out how silly this thread truly is, doubtful though.

Allenhurst NJ
Username hidden
(16378 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
It's like that lady with the Plastic face said a few short years ago..... " We have to pass this bill , so we can see what's in it....."

Burlingham NY
Username hidden
(9680 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Still haven't read the treaty, eh? I mean why should you read the that treaty, when it's just intellectually easier to insult Republicans, it's en vogue these days by the lower in IQ of the generally intelligent Left.

Allenhurst NJ
Username hidden
(16378 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Sedu:

A sanction can be placed against any nation for any reason. The nation needs not sign any treaty.

Hazle Township PA
Username hidden
(7232 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Have you read the treaty?

Allenhurst NJ
Username hidden
(16378 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Hmmm sanctions to start with?

Allenhurst NJ
Username hidden
(16378 posts)
GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Start   21 to 30 of 46   End
TOPIC: Republican Senators rejected a United Nations treaty