125
Obama Administration Expected to Directly Aid Syria's Rebels : Swingers Discussion 2178501031
Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

HELP
FORUMSGeneral DiscussionsPoliticsObama Administration Expected to Directly Aid Syria's Rebels
TOPIC: Obama Administration Expected to Directly Aid Syria's Rebels
GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Start   31 to 40 of 49   End
User Details are only visible to members.
Vacp:

The answer is complex and multifacited, but lets examine it.

Israel might have a kick ass military force when put against another military force. But if they are drawn into city fighting, their tech is as useless as our own... Unless Israel decides to throw international law to the wind and kill every living human between their troops and their targets.

So if Egypt fails, if it is totally handed over to the radicals. Israel will have yet another angry, backwards thinking, radical nation on their hands.

It is basically why we have social welfare in the US to begin with. As the public becomes more hungry, they turn to whom ever can provide them with the minimum of society.

For a religious people who live in conditions which are only best described as the third world or barely developing to a better condition than the third world... Religion is that more, it is still their driving force in their lives because they have nothing else as it stands now.

Let me put it to you like this. If it hasn't been for the Roosevelt republicans of the 1920s/1930s.... and if not for WWII. This nation would likely be a socialist nation right now.

Why? Because conservatives would have told the starving masses (as the result of the dust bowl and depression) to fend for yourselves. They would, they would band together with whom ever promised them better and they would either through the power of their votes or through force of arms (which at the time was still possible, but not today) would change this country into a more socialist nation.

That is why we give Egypt money.

We also give them technology, namely weapons tech, because we know what they can do with it and so does Israel. Would you rather they have Russian or Chinese weapons? Weapons not dependent upon our manufacturers for parts?

Hazle Township PA
 
 
Username hidden
(6871 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
He has lied since day one. I don't think the brain washed ones will care. They will still say how great he is.

Berryville VA
 
 
Username hidden
(1750 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Obama is afraid that if we go on just fine after the cuts, people will start to understand they have been lied to. Then they might just pull back the curtain on the Wizard of DC.

Sanford NC
 
 
Username hidden
(19231 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I think the cuts should go through. We need to cut spending. But Obama is making all these dire predictions but yet we are sending money over seas. Maybe he should send it to the head start program he says will by effected by the cuts. After all he cares so much about our kids as he keeps saying.

Berryville VA
 
 
Username hidden
(1750 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Vac. I don't understand why we are helping the rebles. It's my understanding that the rebles are being lead by sunni Islamic extremist. Arn't they the bad guys?

Va I hear what you are saying. What I don't understand even if we call them cuts, isn't this what they have be screaming we need to do. But now that it's suppose to happing everyone is crying foul.


 
 
Username hidden
(1376 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
What if we gave the President everything he wants?

Maybe everyone who wants a job would have one, and we all would have health care?

Infrastructure would be improved, and global warming would be averted, and our children and grandchildren would actually have a future?

Flat Rock NC
 
 
Username hidden
(2984 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
What does anything anyone replied back to me have to do with anything I wrote?

It's not honest to describe a reduction of increases as a "cut".

It's not honest to claim that a reduction of increases is going to bring the country to a grinding halt.

It wasn't honest to claim that we had a tax problem instead of a spending problem.

Chesapeake VA
 
 
Username hidden
(17525 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
VB, why haven't green energy initiatives "solved" global warming? Because at the level we're investing, and the late start we've gotten, it just continues to snowball. The best we can hope for in 2013 is that it won't get worse quite as fast as it would have with no initiatives.

If no guns were sold starting tomorrow, we'd still have gun murders, because there are still millions of guns in the hands of angry and desperate people. Such issues don't just get "fixed" in an instant or in a year.

Flat Rock NC
 
 
Username hidden
(2984 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Robert, We should not be sending weapons to Egypt either. You missed the point. Obama is telling all that we will go down the tubes so to speak. But they are going to send aid to a country that never has been pro-western. And as far as the Muslim statement so be it.

Berryville VA
 
 
Username hidden
(1750 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
VA:

The American public doesn't care where the money comes form, what to know why? Because most of us don't have any savings what so ever. Why?

Because the minimum to live in society is either at or greater than what we are being paid. While those at the very top keep increasing their personal wealth with one method or another... But aren't trickling that wealth down to the people at the bottom.

Thus trickle down economics doesn't work. It like your example are tricks and lies to keep people from seeing that we can't balance our budgets until those at the top bleed more.

Now would it be more efficient for the rich to cut themselves? To pay their employees further down the lines better and require those employees to pay the ones further down from them more. Yes. Why?

because you wouldn't need government employees to tax and review as lengthy tax sheets. You wouldn't need as many government offices for welfare and other programs, you wouldn't need as big of a government as we have now.

Why don't you capitalist do this? Because you think you owe the public nothing. In so doing you show no patriotism to this nation and as such you destroy this nation with the need of welfare programs.

Welfare does destroy a nation, violent revolution because the masses are hungry destroy's it faster.

So when faced with two bad options, you are left with choosing the slow road to death, in hopes that the rich wise up and bleed themselves more so that the government mustn't change to socialism or communism to take care of the angry mobs which will form.

If you think this nation is or is becoming socialist or communist now? Wait another 20 years and ask yourself. How socialist were we in the 1920s and now socialist were we in the 1950s, then ask how socialist we became by 2000. After that, ask yourself how many more social programs were created by 2033.

Hazle Township PA
 
 
Username hidden
(6871 posts)
GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Start   31 to 40 of 49   End
TOPIC: Obama Administration Expected to Directly Aid Syria's Rebels