Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

HELP
FORUMS General Discussions Politics No responsibility works both ways
TOPIC: No responsibility works both ways
Created by: Robert_Hil
Original Starting post for this thread:
When debating conservatives about social responsibility, their most used fall back seems to be that there is no social responsibility, especially when it deals with wages paid to their employees.

Using that same argument, is the employee then not responsible for the continued ability of the employer to do business? If the employee is forced to turn to the government for support, that government must raise taxes, and it cannot take any meaningul amount from those it already pays resources to. So the government must tax the wealthy, and the employers who felt they have no obligation to society, no responsibility to pay a living wage.

Is this circular pain not self evident to those who feel no obligation to pay a living wage?

The same holds true for the existence of the FDA, EPA, OCEA, and other reglatory agencies. If employers felt a sense of responsibility, a moral obligation to make the safest possible product, with the cleanest means possible, these reglatory agencies wouldn't exist, there would never have been a need for them... A need of the people that the government answered.

Like small government? Then why do you empower the big government by improvising and hurting the masses?

GoTo Page: 1 ... More 
 1 to 1 of 1 
User Details are only visible to members.
When debating conservatives about social responsibility, their most used fall back seems to be that there is no social responsibility, especially when it deals with wages paid to their employees.

Using that same argument, is the employee then not responsible for the continued ability of the employer to do business? If the employee is forced to turn to the government for support, that government must raise taxes, and it cannot take any meaningul amount from those it already pays resources to. So the government must tax the wealthy, and the employers who felt they have no obligation to society, no responsibility to pay a living wage.

Is this circular pain not self evident to those who feel no obligation to pay a living wage?

The same holds true for the existence of the FDA, EPA, OCEA, and other reglatory agencies. If employers felt a sense of responsibility, a moral obligation to make the safest possible product, with the cleanest means possible, these reglatory agencies wouldn't exist, there would never have been a need for them... A need of the people that the government answered.

Like small government? Then why do you empower the big government by improvising and hurting the masses?

Hazle Township PA
Username hidden
(7782 posts)
GoTo Page: 1 ... More 
 1 to 1 of 1 
TOPIC: No responsibility works both ways