No babies for you: Swingers Discussion 205778

SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

TOPIC: No babies for you

Created by: Seduction4Two Original Starting post for this thread:
"WASHINGTON -- For the growing number of soldiers and Marines whose genitals are damaged or destroyed by blasts from improvised explosive devices while in combat, the Pentagon has decided it will not provide some critical reproductive health benefits. To put it bluntly, if you are sent to war and an IED blast blows off your testicles, the U.S. government will not pay for your wife to have in vitro fertilization or artificial insemination using donated sperm. The new policy, quietly adopted without announcement by the Defense Department, responds to the growing demands of the more than 1,800 veterans with genital wounds that the government that sent them to war now help them return to normal life, including raising a family. The policy authorizes payment for some reproductive procedures for the first time, including limited in vitro fertilization and artificial insemination. But it also specifically excludes covering males who cannot produce sperm. "Third-party donations and surrogacy are not covered benefits," the policy states firmly. The Pentagon decision dashes the hopes of a growing number of young Americans wounded in combat and unable to produce sperm who had wanted to start a family. In one recent U.S. military study, the average age of those with genital wounds was 24 years. The majority of those in military service -- 56 percent -- are married. Pentagon officials were not immediately available to explain their decision to deny benefits to couples like Heather and Mark Litynski, a Marine who lost both legs and his left arm, along with his testicles, to an IED blast in Afghanistan almost two years ago."

Created by: Seduction4Two
Original Starting post for this thread:

"WASHINGTON -- For the growing number of soldiers and Marines whose genitals are damaged or destroyed by blasts from improvised explosive devices while in combat, the Pentagon has decided it will not provide some critical reproductive health benefits.

To put it bluntly, if you are sent to war and an IED blast blows off your testicles, the U.S. government will not pay for your wife to have in vitro fertilization or artificial insemination using donated sperm.

The new policy, quietly adopted without announcement by the Defense Department, responds to the growing demands of the more than 1,800 veterans with genital wounds that the government that sent them to war now help them return to normal life, including raising a family.

The policy authorizes payment for some reproductive procedures for the first time, including limited in vitro fertilization and artificial insemination. But it also specifically excludes covering males who cannot produce sperm. "Third-party donations and surrogacy are not covered benefits," the policy states firmly.

The Pentagon decision dashes the hopes of a growing number of young Americans wounded in combat and unable to produce sperm who had wanted to start a family. In one recent U.S. military study, the average age of those with genital wounds was 24 years. The majority of those in military service -- 56 percent -- are married.

Pentagon officials were not immediately available to explain their decision to deny benefits to couples like Heather and Mark Litynski, a Marine who lost both legs and his left arm, along with his testicles, to an IED blast in Afghanistan almost two years ago."

GoTo Page: 1 ... More

1 to 9 of 9

User Details are only visible to members.	Save the true patriot crap. When cuts must be made to spending... Programs like these are always the first to be on the. Hopping block... Not the gulf courses for the generals.
Hazle Township PA			Username hidden (4861 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Apples and oranges. A vet sick, maimed of a limb, burned all over, dying......(my point) In comparison to guy one or two balls short of a pair (your point). Homeless guys are not wishing for more dependents, but warm,dry clothes, a roof, and food they didn't dig out of a can, This couple (male half) mentioned to me yesterday that he thought Iraq was good, afghan bad.... He also said tat the military is the biggest teet of the govt. he said he thanks the vets, but we don't deserve a pension for "doing our time). Typical.... Wanna used the young ones like toy soldier pawns and replace them. Who in their right mind volunteers for the military if they don't have a pension? The pay, travel, school money, retirement benefits, etc are why ppl join, not patriotic. A true patriot would not accept money, but purely volunteer. We joined for many reasons, but no pay was not one..
Tempe AZ			Username hidden (2032 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	"artificial insemination using donated sperm" I am confidant the denizens of this tribunal are cognizant of one gratuitous bantam fornitore of such atypically sanguine vichyssoise.
Chesapeake VA			Username hidden (11838 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	I am genuinely fascinated at the hypocrisy of this "liberal". On one hand he pulls he's demanding that the tax money going to Israel in military aid, needs to be spent on wounded American veterans. On the other hand, when presented with facts that wounded soldiers are being fucked in the ass by their own government after serving their own nation, the very same "liberal" is claiming, "oh well, let them be wounded, just deal with it" WTF? I'm so happy that he's supporting the left.
Colts Neck NJ			Username hidden (12313 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Cur, Another fact free post. Congrats! When there are no Repub on food stamp, unemployment insurance, section 8, ER visits, etc. At that time will your comment hold water.
Tempe AZ			Username hidden (2032 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Sed,,,guess it must be better to spend the taxpayers money on non-veterans that won't even work a civilian job,,let alone serve their country. The Liberals don't mind free healthcare, food, clothing, ect. ect. ect. for the non working lazy ass class that just loves the Government.
Winterville NC			Username hidden (552 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Sed, Why not accept this injury, such as the injured soldiers with LIFE-THREATENING injuries? Do you think a guy or woman missing a limb, vision, jaw bone, burns, etc want to hear someone BITCH ABOUT NOT HAVING CHILDREN? Adopt kids, don't have kids, but either way.... Move on and be glad you're on the right side of the grass. Many ppl with two balls that can't have kids.... Now what? Spend money on them as well?
Tempe AZ			Username hidden (2032 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	War has casualities and the such. That 21-22 yrold caught in Stopp Loss is working past his contractural agreement date..... Injured or killed. Does his family get twice the insurance money? He was bound to generate millions with his degree and academics in engineering or medicine or athletic skills on the field. Want the govt to spend your tax dollars on guys wit less than two functioning testes? Ok. Got your 5 mins of attention with this post.
Tempe AZ			Username hidden (2032 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	"WASHINGTON -- For the growing number of soldiers and Marines whose genitals are damaged or destroyed by blasts from improvised explosive devices while in combat, the Pentagon has decided it will not provide some critical reproductive health benefits. To put it bluntly, if you are sent to war and an IED blast blows off your testicles, the U.S. government will not pay for your wife to have in vitro fertilization or artificial insemination using donated sperm. The new policy, quietly adopted without announcement by the Defense Department, responds to the growing demands of the more than 1,800 veterans with genital wounds that the government that sent them to war now help them return to normal life, including raising a family. The policy authorizes payment for some reproductive procedures for the first time, including limited in vitro fertilization and artificial insemination. But it also specifically excludes covering males who cannot produce sperm. "Third-party donations and surrogacy are not covered benefits," the policy states firmly. The Pentagon decision dashes the hopes of a growing number of young Americans wounded in combat and unable to produce sperm who had wanted to start a family. In one recent U.S. military study, the average age of those with genital wounds was 24 years. The majority of those in military service -- 56 percent -- are married. Pentagon officials were not immediately available to explain their decision to deny benefits to couples like Heather and Mark Litynski, a Marine who lost both legs and his left arm, along with his testicles, to an IED blast in Afghanistan almost two years ago."
Colts Neck NJ			Username hidden (12313 post)

GoTo Page: 1 ... More

1 to 9 of 9

TOPIC: No babies for you

		HELP
FORUMS: General Discussions: Politics: No babies for you