125
Legal case for drone strikes on Americans : Swingers Discussion 2164301011
Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

HELP
FORUMSGeneral DiscussionsPoliticsLegal case for drone strikes on Americans
TOPIC: Legal case for drone strikes on Americans
GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Start   11 to 20 of 88   End
User Details are only visible to members.
** Given that everything you stand for politically seems to be based on misinformation, baseless assertions, and ad-hominem attacks, I wouldn't expect much different. **

We got us another Bobby here. Another one proclaiming to know what others stand for. You have no idea occupier, no idea at all.

Colts Neck NJ
 
 
Username hidden
(16526 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
It just doesn't get any richer than this. You enter the fora proclaiming your disapproval that regulars are calling each other names (libtards etc...). Stating that no serious discourse can be conducted as a result, and then proceed to engage in the same behavior. Painting the Right as a bunch of imbeciles unable to structure a sentence together, and the left as reasonable and logical. When forced to swallow your own hypocrisy you get your panties in a wad, launch a personal attack and pretend that you did not? fascinating...truly is. Is it any wonder that your group of occupiers failed!

Colts Neck NJ
 
 
Username hidden
(16526 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
If believing that makes you happy, Sedu, knock yourself out. Given that everything you stand for politically seems to be based on misinformation, baseless assertions, and ad-hominem attacks, I wouldn't expect much different. I can only hope that this means you stop talking to me entirely.

Easton PA
 
 
Username hidden
(78 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
PP. tell take to the people of Egypt.


 
 
Username hidden
(849 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
The "regressive far-right" is self-insulting and doesn't need any embellishment. You can just quote them.

Flat Rock NC
 
 
Username hidden
(2984 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Ok, so you're no different, you were just trying to pretend you are. Thanks for the clarification.

Colts Neck NJ
 
 
Username hidden
(16526 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
By contrast, the credo of Likud is 'there shall be no independent Palestinian state west of the Jordan river"

WHO is the bigger threat to peace?

Rosemont IL
 
 
Username hidden
(3771 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Sedu, I cannot argue your declaration that my post is drivel - for you are a preeminent expert in the field.

I can tell you that I'm hardly 'outraged' that people with no facts or logic behind their argument call each other retards on the internet. That's basically what the internet is built on.

And that quote of mine you posted groups the collective mid-line response from the 'Left' and 'Right' as vaguely defined and polarized opposites, and is not a direct insult at either. Those are quite literally the way the two sides have been reacting for years - and you're free to interpret that as you wish.

Fortunately for the country, planet, and humanity in general, most people in this country are interpreting that as "Regressive Far-Right thinking has outlived its' usefulness, we'll vote in anyone but them until they implode or have a civil war to sort out their house,".

Easton PA
 
 
Username hidden
(78 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Actually...THIS is the Muslim brotherhoods stated credo

We believe that the political reform is the true and natural gateway for all other kinds of reform. We have announced our acceptance of democracy that acknowledges political pluralism, the peaceful rotation of power and the fact that the nation is the source of all powers. As we see it, political reform includes the termination of the state of emergency, restoring public freedoms, including the right to establish political parties, whatever their tendencies may be, and the freedom of the press, freedom of criticism and thought, freedom of peaceful demonstrations, freedom of assembly, etc. It also includes the dismantling of all exceptional courts and the annulment of all exceptional laws, establishing the independence of the judiciary, enabling the judiciary to fully and truly supervise general elections so as to ensure that they authentically express people's will, removing all obstacles that restrict the functioning of civil society organizations,

Rosemont IL
 
 
Username hidden
(3771 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
After you posted this drivel, you expect people to believe your faux outrage about others using the words libturd and rethuds? really? how are you different?

===================== 6 years ago:

The Left: "Bush never actually won his first election and thus his entire presidency is in doubt, he is destroying all sorts of American freedoms and used 9/11 as an excuse to wage wars of choice and lead thousands of Americans into death! Regardless of affiliation, those responsible need to answer for this." The Right: TURRORISTS R BAD IF U DONT LYKE IT GET OUT OF AMURRICA!!!1"

Today: The Left: "Obama's drone policy raises serious concerns regarding not only human rights in general, but specifically the rights of American citizens. Regardless of part affiliation, those responsible need to answer for this." The Right: "OBAMA SHOOTIN TURRORISTS WITH DRONES IS EVIL 2ND AMENDMENT GOD N GUNS MUSLIM KENYAN GUN GRABBER SOCIALIST NAZI*(^#%(*^#%*(@#*(!@$!!!!!"

Colts Neck NJ
 
 
Username hidden
(16526 posts)
GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Start   11 to 20 of 88   End
TOPIC: Legal case for drone strikes on Americans