155

|
|
TOPIC: Is man capable of selfless acts of altruism
|
|
|
Start
91 to 100 of 114
End
|
User Details are only visible to members.
|
All this justification of selfishness being inherent and the dominant human trait makes me wonder what life would be like if everyone just gave into it. I mean, it's human right? Why not fully embrace selfishness and just become apathetic towards any and everyone that is not in your immediate inner circle of friends and family? Fuck the world, so to speak ... bellum omnium contra omnes.
I really don't see how a world like that -- one dominated by selfish people -- could be good. |
||
Goose Creek SC |
Username hidden
(1690 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Objektivists would argue that selfishness is a good thing.
(no that's not a spelling error, I lost the letter after "B" on my komputer) |
||
Palm Beach Gardens FL |
Username hidden
(1095 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Very good points, Angel. The human species would have never survived had it been innately selfless. A species has to be selfish to survive...and be on top of the food chain.
|
||
Mountain Ranch CA |
Username hidden
(8750 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
"But people perform acts of drudgery all the time. "
Like what? Every act of drudgery I have ....does have a benefit tied to it. |
||
Mountain Ranch CA |
Username hidden
(8750 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Arlington TX |
Username hidden
(2285 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Mountain Ranch CA |
Username hidden
(8750 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
The problem with the psychological egoism perspective is that it is justified with circular logic. "If a person willingly performs an act, that means he expects to derive personal gain/enjoyment from it; therefore, people only perform acts that give them personal gain/enjoyment".
But people perform acts of drudgery all the time. |
||
Goose Creek SC |
Username hidden
(1690 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
That's a pretty bleak perspective ya got there Simba. Wish I could say you were wrong ...
|
||
Goose Creek SC |
Username hidden
(1690 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
ER.... I don't think most people in those positions of doctors, nurses etc... are selfless. I have seen a lot of selfish doctors. LOL! I think if there were more unselfish motivations we would have waiting lines for doctors to go to foreign countries and treat people that have no money no means. Sure....there are plenty of doctors that do ,but not nearly enough compared to how many there are in the world. People like to think they are selfless but when push comes to shove.... usually money or the instinct for self survival wins in the end (two things selflessness must overcome).
|
||
Mountain Ranch CA |
Username hidden
(8750 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Admittedly, sacrificing oneself for another is the ultimate act of altruism, but it's hardly the metric of man's capability of selflessness.
The question is whether or not man in general is capable of random acts of kindness, love, compassion, etc. without the desire for personal gain biasing him. |
||
Goose Creek SC |
Username hidden
(1690 post)
|
||
Start
91 to 100 of 114
End
|
TOPIC: Is man capable of selfless acts of altruism
|