I hold Obama directly responsible for this: Swingers Discussion 217097

155
I hold Obama directly responsible for this: Swingers Discussion 217097

Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

TOPIC: I hold Obama directly responsible for this

Created by: norcalcouple100 Original Starting post for this thread:
stevequayle. com/index.php?s=33&d=285 Ain't it great??????

GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 to 10 of 73

End

User Details are only visible to members.	I see there is a outbreak of Obama skin pigment derangement syndrome....BTW...here are Obama's vs Congress actual approval numbers Obama RCP Average 2/21 - 3/12 -- 48.5 46.1 +2.4 ABC News/Wash Post 3/7 - 3/10 RV 51 46 +5 Gallup 3/10 - 3/12 1500 A 49 45 +4 Rasmussen Reports 3/10 - 3/12 1500 LV 51 49 +2 Reason-Rupe/PSRAI 2/21 - 2/25 1002 A 51 43 +8 NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 2/21 - 2/24 1000 A 50 45 +5 Congress Congressional Job Approval ABC News/Wash Post Approve 14, Disapprove 82 Disapprove +68 Congressional Job Approval Gallup Approve 13, Disapprove 83 Disapprove +70
Elk Grove Village IL			Username hidden (2627 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Love Affair Ending? Obama's Political Capital Declining Bert Atkinson Jr. March 12, 2013 The second term is notoriously tough for two term candidates. Clinton had a little snafu on his …hands during his second term that led to impeachment, and George W. Bush was demonized time and time again. Now, it could be that Barack Obama is facing a similar fate… If President Barack Obama had piled up political capital with his impressive re-election, it’s largely gone. His approval rating has dropped to the lowest level in more than a year, with more voters now turning thumbs down on his performance than thumbs up, according to a new McClatchy-Marist poll. The measure of how much people like him also has dropped. He’s still vastly more popular than Congress, particularly congressional Republicans. But in the biggest political clash of the year – over the federal budget and how to curb deficits – voters split 44 percent to 42 percent between preferring Congress or Obama. What? There’s no Mitt Romney to be held up against? Blame Congressional Republicans all you want, but in 50 years when children are reading American history books about the infamous fiscal cliff/debt ceiling/sequestration debacles of 2013, they will certainly not remember names like Mitch McConnell or John Boehner; they will absolutely read about President Obama and how all of this happened under his lack of leadership. “This may be the downside of him coming out of the box stronger in the second term,” Miringoff said. “People are now looking for him to lead us out of this stalemate, provide more leadership. People see him as a strong figure and in the driver’s seat. During the election, it was him versus Romney. Now it’s him versus people’s expectations for the country.” Expectations: Obama will have a tough time meeting them. I know the mainstream media has been in the tank for Obama for a half-decade now, but they still answer to ratings. If I had to take a guess, I would say that there will be more negative news stemming from the growing discontent of his ability to follow through on his promises. I’m not saying we’re about to see MSNBC go all Fox News on the guy, but the broken promises and evolutions and flip-flops can only go on for so long before people start catching on. Let’s just say that if Obama is still sending a thrill up your leg at this point, you’ve got some issues. (Looking at you, Chris Matthews.) By 45-37 percent, they blame congressional Republicans more than Obama for the recent failure to find a better alternative to reducing deficits than the $85 billion in automatic spending cuts now taking effect. Twelve percent said both shared the blame equally. Yet by 44-42 percent they prefer the Republican approach to curbing the deficit. Seven percent preferred neither way. More people prefer the Republican approach, but also blame Republicans more than Obama? Whhaaa??? Just wait and stay patient my Conservative friends. The media’s love affair must come to an end at some point. What goes up must come down.
Berryville VA			Username hidden (1482 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Owebama is nothing but another shuckin and jivin street thug who has lied his way into power. Eventually he will end up like Edi Amin or more hopefully like Mussolini.
Spring Branch TX			Username hidden (210 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Quite the opposite Mark...Obamacare is productive me NO LONGER subsidizing swilling beer, NASCAR tickets and 3 packs of cigarettes a day because health insurance is not a priority for you....set your priorities and take responsibility
Elk Grove Village IL			Username hidden (2627 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	I hold obama responsible for the sequester. As to Obamacare, Obamacare is naturally supported by the morbidly obese. It's a win win for the self indulgent.
Colts Neck NJ			Username hidden (12313 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	"Big your right. Obama is getting more power everyday and people don't realize it." Yep, most powerful president ever... Even more powerful than the constitution! All those white presidents before him were just so lazy and didn't know how to work in the gray areas of the Constitution....
Tempe AZ			Username hidden (2032 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	pp: Obviously your by choice, one of those very ill people who demand heathly people like me to subsidize your health care.
Tulare CA			Username hidden (1881 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	"Well you can start with socialized medicine" A law that mandates individual purchase of insurance through private companies is socialist? Really? .....must be one of those "low information" voters we hear about
Elk Grove Village IL			Username hidden (2627 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Journalist Bob Woodward on Wednesday criticized Barack Obama's handling of the automatic U.S. budget cuts set to take effect this week, calling the president's decision to hold back on military deployments "madness." His comments continued what has become a running dispute between Woodward, perhaps the country's best-known print journalist, and the Democratic White House over who is responsible for the across-the-board cuts scheduled to begin on Friday. Last week, Woodward published an opinion piece in the Washington Post - where he is an associate editor - saying the administration was "wrong" to blame the cuts on Republicans. That drew retorts from White House press secretary Jay Carney, who in posts on Twitter and later in comments to reporters blamed the budget stalemate on Republican opposition to including increased revenues in any deal to replace the cuts. The $85 billion across-the-board budget cuts were mandated by Congress and the White House as part of the August 2011 deal to avoid a government default. The reductions are split between defense spending and domestic programs. Woodward, who first gained fame in the 1970s from exposing the Watergate scandal during the administration of President Richard Nixon, wrote a detailed account in his 2012 book, "The Price of Politics," of the August 2011 deal that led to the cuts. On Wednesday he attacked Obama for drawing national security into the budget debate. "So we now have the president going out (saying) 'Because of this piece of paper and this agreement, I can't do what I need to do to protect the country.' That's a kind of madness that I haven't seen in a long time," Woodward told MSNBC on Wednesday. On Tuesday, Obama warned of threats to Navy readiness in a visit to the Newport News Shipbuilding shipyard in Virginia, where maintenance to the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln has been delayed by the budget crisis. Earlier this month, the Pentagon said it was delaying deployment of another carrier, the USS Harry Truman, to the Middle East because of funding. Obama's decision to drag the military into the budget fight likely would not have happened in previous administrations, Republican or Democratic, Woodward added on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" program.
Berryville VA			Username hidden (1482 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Sixteen Democratic senators who voted for the Affordable Care Act are asking that one of its fundraising mechanisms, a 2.3 percent tax on medical devices scheduled to take effect January 1, be delayed. Echoing arguments made by Republicans against Obamacare, the Democratic senators say the levy will cost jobs — in a statement Monday, Sen. Al Franken called it a “job-killing tax” — and also impair American competitiveness in the medical device field. The senators, who made the request in a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, are Franken, Richard Durbin, Charles Schumer, Patty Murray, John Kerry, Kirsten Gillibrand, Amy Klobuchar, Joseph Lieberman, Ben Nelson, Robert Casey, Debbie Stabenow, Barbara Mikulski, Kay Hagan, Herb Kohl, Jeanne Shaheen, and Richard Blumenthal. All voted for Obamacare. Two other Democrats, senators-elect Joe Donnelly and Elizabeth Warren, also signed the letter. Donnelly voted for Obamacare as a member of the House. Warren was not in Congress at the time. “The medical technology industry directly employs over 400,000 people in the United States and is responsible for a total of two million skilled manufacturing jobs,” the senators wrote in a December 4 letter to Reid. “We must do all we can to ensure that our country maintains its global leadership position in the medical technology industry and keeps good jobs here at home.”
Berryville VA			Username hidden (1482 post)

GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 to 10 of 73

End

TOPIC: I hold Obama directly responsible for this