115
Here is why banning weapons won't set us free from fear : Swingers Discussion 2139541081
Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

HELP
FORUMSGeneral DiscussionsPoliticsHere is why banning weapons won't set us free from fear
TOPIC: Here is why banning weapons won't set us free from fear
GoTo Page: Less ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... More 
Start   81 to 90 of 170   End
User Details are only visible to members.
"Once they serve their time..."

Funny, I don't see that phrase anywhere in the constitution...

Lakeside CA
 
 
Username hidden
(17234 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Chicago just logged it's 500th death by firearm this year. The city with probably the most regulated firearms laws in this country. All those laws to keep the law abiding citizen from owning firearms in order to protect themselves.

Tulare CA
 
 
Username hidden
(1880 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Can a person bear a nuclear weapon TBR? I was expecting this, do you know how many civilians have access to nuclear material that can be used to kill mass amounts of people? Do you know how easy it would be for them? Is there a problem with it?

And yes I believe felons have as much right once they serve their time to bear arms. I mean that is why we send them to prison, to atone for their crimes. If we all have the right to self defense why should their families be subject to mayhem? Did they commit a crime? Besides the fact, a overbearing fact that it does not work. Criminal do have guns, they are criminals for Christ's sake. Does anybody in their right mind think they care about stupid gun laws? They break laws, that is why they are criminals.

Sanford NC
 
 
Username hidden
(19231 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
If we are to take your assertion at face value, then felons should be able to own guns, or you should be able to own a nuclear weapon.

They can't and you can't.

I rest my case.

Lakeside CA
 
 
Username hidden
(17234 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
The purpose of government is to screw the people, the people who founded this country knew that. That is the reason safeguards were put in place, it doesn't do any good though when the government ignores those safe guards.

It is our own fault though, we let the government get out of hand. Actually I believe this fiscal cliff will be a good thing, or I hope.

Sanford NC
 
 
Username hidden
(19231 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
So many posts in so many threads I’m losing track of what was posted where.

One thing for sure, all this gun talk has thoroughly distracted us from the fact that we all are about to be economically screwed.


 
 
Username hidden
(1051 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Good there are no rules in the forums as to who can get in a discussion. Wayne only says we are supposed to be nice. I like discussions with TBR when they are polite, I respect him when he presents his position in an intelligent manner.

Sanford NC
 
 
Username hidden
(19231 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Sorry about getting in the middle of your discussion tbr and fj.

Brooklyn Park MN
 
 
Username hidden
(3843 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Outdoors, you asked what I may suggest as a "solution", I noted some before, but to respond to your recent question:

Improved law enforcement access to mental health records, and responding to 911 calls involving the applicant, for applications to purchase, posses, and carry firearms.

Requiring firearms, when in storage, to be stored in such a manner that they are inaccessible to anyone but the owner. Such as the storage area having a fingerprint activated lock.

Brooklyn Park MN
 
 
Username hidden
(3843 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
TBR, only one right in the constitution uses the words "SHALL NOT be infringed".

And all other rights are contingent on acts not tools. Tongues cannot be cut out because the state believes it would be best. Fingers cannot be cut off to limit writings. All rights except for the second are contingent on acts. And let's remember that BOR was never about control of people, it always was about control of government over the people.

Sanford NC
 
 
Username hidden
(19231 posts)
GoTo Page: Less ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... More 
Start   81 to 90 of 170   End
TOPIC: Here is why banning weapons won't set us free from fear