Here is why banning weapons wont set us free from fear: Swingers Discussion 2139541031

SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

TOPIC: Here is why banning weapons won't set us free from fear

GoTo Page: Less ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... More

Start

31 to 40 of 172

End

User Details are only visible to members.	Robert. In the US you do not need them, This liberal crap is worn out. There were over 500 homicides in Chicago last year. Take your white ass to Chicago and walk the streets like any citizen should be able to and tell me that you don't need to be armed. Work 40 miles from the nearest paved road like I do several months each year where the only people you see most morning going to work are the scrappers out stealing metal or the Meth cooks going home from a night of making drugs. I heard an exchange of gunfire last spring up there. I waited about an hour and went down to investigate. Two bodies. I had to go to the top of the nearest mountain to get my cell to work to report it. It took them an hour and a half to respond. And your were saying?????? I am a legally armed citizen, I earned that right and you are never going to take that away from me!!!!! In my world I take care of me and all the other players are armed. They will never turn their guns in or leave them at home. You live in your own world and it is very small as are the horizons of your experience and intellect.
Red Bluff CA			Username hidden (438 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	I belive airport secuity SHOULD be paid the passengers..........BS
Kingston TN			Username hidden (1912 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Only bicycle riders should be taxed for bike paths, and trails. This cost should be collected through the sale of bicycles and the parts and accessories. There should be licensing, and registration of these idiots that get on highways and endanger everybody.
Sanford NC			Username hidden (18796 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	"Jack or anyone, do you believe the gun industry should pay for improved security? " Do you believe that Airport security should paid soley by taxes on those that fly and work in the airline industry?? Quit being a jackass.
Pittsburgh PA			Username hidden (14584 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Jack or anyone, do you believe the gun industry should pay for improved security? Should guns and ammo have much higher taxes than they now have, to pay for the prevention and the damage done by them?
Flat Rock NC			Username hidden (2787 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	I wonder how we spend protecting less than 500 people in the White House and on Capitol Hill.
Pittsburgh PA			Username hidden (14584 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	One of my points is that the business model for these insane individuals that kill unarmed, unprotected vulnerable people does not required an AR-15. It can be done with other weapons. Banning the AR-15 or the high capacity magazines will not stop these attacks. The operating method is most dependant upon having, finding, and planning for a 'field of unguarded sheep to slaughter,' not so much the particular weapon. In a planned-out scenario, any firearm can kill dozens of people. It's an old and accurate statement that criminals hit the easiest targets. They break into the house with flimsy locks, they mug the feeble but rich-looking old lady, etc... A movie theater, a school full of kids fit the easy to kill unprotected field of sheep model that these psychos are looking for. We have all kinds of airport securityin place with 10's of thousands of people employed in this endeavor. We do this because we have seen what determined people can do with just some box cutters. We always have plenty of police and security at a football or basketball game. I think it is reasonable that any assembly of 100 or more people should have protection, too. And the top of this list is schools. it's not just psychos that want to shoot the place up, it's also non-custodial parents trying to take their kids, gangs and many other issues. We now live in the jet-age, the computer-age, the internet-age... Shouldn't our security be better than it was in the 'Leave It to Beaver' age?
Greenville SC			Username hidden (349 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	TBR - You made me spit coffee.
Pittsburgh PA			Username hidden (14584 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Just, 2/3 of the world has easy acess to guns... Most are third world nations where you need them... In the US you do not need them, they do not protect you from a tyrannical takeover of the US government and the loss of the vote, as you and your buddies will be blasted into but sized bits from 30,000 feet into their air... By a pilot in the safty of his aircraft. M-16 vs F-16 = M-16 user dead. You will not take and hold any land as you will be surrounded and them if need be to stop you... Gased with any weapon needed. After all we speak of tyrrany and tyrants, not democracies and elected officials. They don't need the votes and support of the people. Simply kill enough civilians and the survivors will obey until you lose power by some means... Then you are dead too.
Hazle Township PA			Username hidden (4780 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	the afgan people believe and practice freedom more in fact then in theory.how free are they and how free are we..............BS
Kingston TN			Username hidden (1912 post)

GoTo Page: Less ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... More

Start

31 to 40 of 172

End

TOPIC: Here is why banning weapons won't set us free from fear

		HELP
FORUMS: General Discussions: Politics: Here is why banning weapons won't set us free from fear