165

|
|
TOPIC: Court says police don't have to prove dog training
|
|
|
Start
31 to 40 of 42
End
|
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Hazle Township PA |
Username hidden
(4811 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
*Who the hell keeps more than maybe 100 USD on their person or in their home these days? *
People who are not in debt! |
||
Colts Neck NJ |
Username hidden
(12261 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Doesn't all US paper currency have cocaine residue on it? Something like one bill that has been used to snort the stuff contaminate several dozen like bills when they go through counting machines?
|
||
Tulare CA |
Username hidden
(1881 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
norc:
1) If you are being hit by a drug raid... Obviously you have been hanging with the wrong group of people and have had a great amount of foot traffic into your home. 2) Who the hell keeps more than maybe 100 USD on their person or in their home these days? I mean really? you keep any real amount of cash on hand? 20,000, 50,000 USD? 3) The dogs used to sniff out IED's and other war time issues aren't going to be brought into court... and shouldn't be. I don't see how this ruling affects the US military in any way. |
||
Hazle Township PA |
Username hidden
(4811 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Red Bluff CA |
Username hidden
(438 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Red Bluff CA |
Username hidden
(438 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
The handler is the actual person giving testimony, I would imagine that his/her training would still be admissible. I am disappointed with the courts ruling though, if people's privacy is to be invaded, the dog should have a good track record. But if the handler has a poor record, there would be little need to bring the dog onto it.
|
||
Sanford NC |
Username hidden
(18796 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Everything is a tool, people in particular. Dogs in the hands of an experienced handler, can indeed be considered a tool. A machine? no.
|
||
Colts Neck NJ |
Username hidden
(12261 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Dogs are not machines. A handler can knowingly or unknowingly influence a dog to alert by acting in a certain manner.
|
||
Brooklyn Park MN |
Username hidden
(2589 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
X-ray machines have to be calibrated. Just like radar guns do so what is the difference a tool is a tool then.
|
||
Berryville VA |
Username hidden
(1457 post)
|
||
Start
31 to 40 of 42
End
|
TOPIC: Court says police don't have to prove dog training
|