A Liberal challenge: Swingers Discussion 88886

SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

TOPIC: A Liberal challenge

Created by: lustyrocker Original Starting post for this thread:
Well well well. It seems that there are a few people on these forums who live to stalk around, POLICING (or at least attempting) the political exchanges of everyone else with PRE- EMPTIVE STRIKES; aping their party in an attempt to SHOCK & AWE us LIBERALS into just shutting - up. Hardly a behavior pattern befitting DEMOCRACY. Modern conservatives claim to advocate smaller government and a laissez- faire mentality, and that ALL liberal thought, supposedly because it is flawed from the get- go, cannot stand on it's own merits. So here is my challenge: leave us alone. Let THIS THREAD, and only this thread, be an open LIBERAL discussion area. Feel free to read it, but leave your dogma- spewing, name- calling, hate- baiting diatribes for the other threads. Let's see what WE can come up with when we're not reacting to these demagogues so much. What do you say, conservatives? Since we're SO mistaken and MISGUIDED, surely you can spare a bit of bandwidth to let us rant unabated? Hell, I'm even giving you the O.K. to SPY on us! NO WARRANTS! After- all we're just a bunch of swingers- not making policy. So why not- lest you're afraid of what we might come- up with? If you see something you don't like, you can always START YOUR OWN *^%#!ING THREAD, for a change. I'd read it. So- CENTRISTS and PROGRESSIVES, LIBERALS and MODERATES, here's the spot- let's abandon this stupid heckling and find some real solutions to some very real problems! 1st topic (or post your own): Is it possible to redirect our enviromental paradigm from one of resources management to one of stewardship (or some other) w/o abandoning capitalism on some or all levels?

Created by: lustyrocker
Original Starting post for this thread:

Well well well.  It seems that there are a few people on these forums who live to stalk around, POLICING (or at least attempting) the political exchanges of everyone else with PRE- EMPTIVE STRIKES; aping their party in an attempt to SHOCK & AWE us LIBERALS into just shutting - up.  Hardly a behavior pattern befitting DEMOCRACY.
Modern conservatives claim to advocate smaller government and a laissez- faire mentality, and that ALL liberal thought, supposedly because it is flawed from the get- go, cannot stand on it's own merits.
So here is my challenge: leave us alone.  Let THIS THREAD, and only this thread, be an open LIBERAL discussion area.  Feel free to read it, but leave your dogma- spewing, name- calling, hate- baiting diatribes for the other threads.  Let's see what WE  can come up with when we're not reacting to these demagogues so much.
What do you say, conservatives?  Since we're SO mistaken and MISGUIDED, surely you can spare a bit of bandwidth to let us rant unabated?  Hell, I'm even giving you the O.K. to SPY on us!  NO WARRANTS!  After- all we're just a bunch of swingers- not making policy.  So why not- lest you're afraid of what we might come- up with?  If you see something you don't like, you can always  START YOUR OWN *^%#!ING THREAD, for a change.  I'd read it.
So- CENTRISTS and PROGRESSIVES, LIBERALS and MODERATES, here's the spot- let's abandon this stupid heckling and find some real solutions to some very real problems!

1st topic (or post your own):  Is it possible to redirect our enviromental paradigm from one of resources management to one of stewardship (or some other) w/o abandoning capitalism on some or all levels?

GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... More

1 to 10 of 80

End

User Details are only visible to members.	A constant force, acting on a particle of mass m, will produce a constant acceleration a. Let us choose the x-axis to be in the common direction of F and a. What is the work done by this force on the particle in causing a displacement x? We have, for constant acceleration, the relations a = ( V - v ) / t and x = ½ ( V + v ) t. Here v is the particle's speed at t = 0 and V is its speed at time t. The the work done is W = F x = m a x = m ( ( V - v ) / t ) ( ½ ( V + v ) ) t = ½ m V² - ½ m v². We call one-half the product of the mass of a body and the square of its speed the kinetic energy of the body. If we represent kinetic energy by the symbol K, then K = ½ m v². We may then state the above equation in this way: The work done by the resultant force acting on a particle is equal to the change in the kinetic energy of the particle. Ahh that feels better, and later kids we will discuss the formula for suds in beer!
Grantham NH			Username hidden (1472 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	and our old friend Coulter repeated the story on MSNBC... i read the story and unnamed source says, he met her at a bar?? sounds fishy to me.. although i did meet mrs dzzy in a bar :-)
Philadelphia PA			Username hidden (5330 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	wow, we are posting from the national inquierer now... i always love the allegations, if proven true line.... btw, if proven true that would indeed be devastating to his campaign
Philadelphia PA			Username hidden (5330 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Presidential candidate John Edwards is caught in a shocking mistress scandal that could wreck his campaign, The NATIONAL ENQUIRER has learned exclusively. Sources have come forward to charge that the "other woman" previously worked on Edwards' campaign and followed the 54-year-old candidate on trips across the U.S. A source close to the woman, whose name is being withheld by The NATIONAL ENQUIRER, says that she confessed to having an affair in phone calls and emails, saying that her work with Edwards soon exploded into romance. The shocking allegation — if proven true — could devastate the Democratic hopeful's campaign, especially because John's devoted wife Elizabeth is locked in a desperate battle with breast cancer. "The affair started about 18 months ago," a friend says the woman confessed to her. "When they met at a bar, sparks flew immediately. "She never expected it would turn sexual since John is married and is running for President. But it soon did — and she fell for him." In one bombshell e-mail message provided to The NATIONAL ENQUIRER, the woman confesses to a friend she's "in love with John," but it's "difficult because he is married and has kids." In another e-mail, she writes: "Last night and this a.m., he actually has amazed me. He is a great man. My heart is loud and my head is silenced." Disclosed her friend: "She initially confided in a few of her closest pals that she was sleeping with 'a married man named John.' "It became clear the married man was John Edwards. They got together whenever they could, mostly at hotels where Edwards and his campaign staff stayed." The woman later spelled it out in a phone call to her pal and talked openly about having an affair with Edwards. The friend says the woman told her that she "had a crush on John. One thing led to another, and they soon ended up in bed together. But she knew there was no way he was going to leave Elizabeth, a wife battling cancer." The ex-Senator's wife was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2004. This past March, the couple announced her cancer had returned, but said his campaign would continue. His spokesman said that allegations Edwards had an affair are "false, absolute nonsense." The woman's friend told The NATIONAL ENQUIRER: "As the affair went on, she said that both she and John began to feel real guilty and they decided to end it." The ENQUIRER made exhaustive but unsuccessful attempts to reach the woman for comment regarding this article but she would not return phone calls or emails or come to the door of the house where she is staying. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Destin FL			Username hidden (14562 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:38 pm Post subject: Liberals/Socialists = Neo Communists -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I like to rattle random thoughts around my head about different things, and came to the frightening conclusion of liberals/socialists are in my opinion Neo Communists. Lets take a look at this. Communists philosophy was everyone was equal, everyone had the same, their was no God or religion, everything was government run, no property, etc. In theory (except for the anti-religion/God part) it sounds great, but as we all know from our history, its not. Anyways lets look at the Liberals and Socialists of today - of any nation - to me its just the Communist movement under different labels. The God component of Communism. They remove God and religion from everything. Look at the Liberals and Socialists of the world. They have chipped and chipped and CHIPPED away at the Christian heritage and influence of nations. And socialism is just basically a vital component of communism. Take universal health care. Sounds great right, wrong. We got waiting times, sub-par treatment, etc. And big government and complete authoritarian was another component of communism. Most Liberal and Socialist governments involve more and more regulations and big government into life. The Libs and Socialists of today are neo-communists...I fully believe it now. Why do we want to tear down a Christian Capitalist society? Its worked! Communism DOESN'T! westmanguy Thank you, just what I was thinking...lol
Destin FL			Username hidden (14562 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:38 pm Post subject: Liberals/Socialists = Neo Communists -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I like to rattle random thoughts around my head about different things, and came to the frightening conclusion of liberals/socialists are in my opinion Neo Communists. Lets take a look at this. Communists philosophy was everyone was equal, everyone had the same, their was no God or religion, everything was government run, no property, etc. In theory (except for the anti-religion/God part) it sounds great, but as we all know from our history, its not. Anyways lets look at the Liberals and Socialists of today - of any nation - to me its just the Communist movement under different labels. The God component of Communism. They remove God and religion from everything. Look at the Liberals and Socialists of the world. They have chipped and chipped and CHIPPED away at the Christian heritage and influence of nations. And socialism is just basically a vital component of communism. Take universal health care. Sounds great right, wrong. We got waiting times, sub-par treatment, etc. And big government and complete authoritarian was another component of communism. Most Liberal and Socialist governments involve more and more regulations and big government into life. The Libs and Socialists of today are neo-communists...I fully believe it now. Why do we want to tear down a Christian Capitalist society? Its worked! Communism DOESN'T! westmanguy Thank you, just what I was thinking...lol
Destin FL			Username hidden (14562 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	why even listen to zeros lies and neocommie illiterate rantings...lol
Destin FL			Username hidden (14562 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Zing - I singled out 'liberals' intentionally. I did not dispute your comments about conservatives and your comments on Dobson. I repeat my question.
Fairfield CA			Username hidden (575 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Zing - Let me try to interpret your earlier comments: Then it is safe to say that the liberals in Washington D.C. are acting in a 'conservative' or 'superior parent' ego state by telling us what is better for us?
Fairfield CA			Username hidden (575 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	the gay blade 30 years ago had a job...now that is priceless..lol
Destin FL			Username hidden (14562 post)

GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... More

1 to 10 of 80

End

TOPIC: A Liberal challenge

		HELP
FORUMS: General Discussions: Politics: A Liberal challenge