Help
FORUMS › General Discussions › Open Forum › so he's not really single
TOPIC: so_he's_not_really_single_
« Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  ... 11  Next »
31 to 40 of 107
User Details are only visible to members.
Ahoy, got no problem with you, or flirting in the thread. no harm, just all in good fun. had no problem with NIC either until he decided to bust out the whuppin' stick. but whatever.

have a great day.

Orlando FL
Username hidden
(976 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Thrillz, i'm sure you are just as sweet as you can be, but i just don't know how else i can help you. are you sure you've read the entire thread? i know it's long, but you've clearly missed a few things.

sorry. NO OFFENSE INTENDED!

Orlando FL
Username hidden
(976 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
**sigh**

NIC, you have shown me the error of my ways, as well as scared the living bejesus out of me with that pic. by all means sir, get down off that white horse so i may bow at your feet. i whole heartedly apologize for being critical toward a member who decided to stick their head into the room with absolutely nothing to add to the conversation other than to cheer for one member and be rude to another.

i (like others) haven't agreed with mrick on all his thoughts, but he has every right to express his thoughts, as well as an explanation of them, with passion. sure he got a little worked up but so what? who has done that? well, present company excluded i'm sure. now if i (or any number of other members here) had done that, it would be called "pot stirring" or i'd be labeled a trouble maker.

i completely support the idea that everyone has a right to participate freely in these forums. but if your only input is to bash on someone for being passionate about making their point, you should expect to get called out on it once in a while. and btw, something tells me that BiFem is probably more than capable of telling me to "fuck off", and she probably will when she reads this. you make it sound as if she's in a corner, (snif, snif) crying her pretty little eyes out because someone said "boo". um, maybe, but i doubt it.

my guess is, that's probably what you do when those mean old "cyber-thugs" say boo to you. oops, i did it again. now, go park the white horse and let's let everyone put on their big boy pants and speak for themselves... you scary, scary man.

if that doesn't work for you, then... "i fart in your general direction".

p.s. see, i have a few intimidating pics as well. :-p

Orlando FL
Username hidden
(976 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Okay, going back in the corner to make out now....bring the honey, Good.

Sometimes it works, and I've suggested it, to write one post, reread it, and then rewrite it. I think I've apologized in the forums, once maybe, and it was unnecessary, but it was b/c I misunderstood something.

And no, I don't take my own advice. I just write and hit "submit."

San Antonio TX
Username hidden
(7602 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Sed, if you ever let your lovely self get close enough to NOLA for me to fuck you up, and down, it won't be quietly.

Rick, hold those thoughts and I'll get back to you later when I have a few minutes.

Belle Chasse LA
Username hidden
(13323 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Go Fish:

JK If you feel its not your responsibility to "investigate" someones marital status, and is not your problem if said person is being unfaithful ,then why is your stance as it reads in #2 of your original post..

If it is not your problem, and I am getting a sense of "I dont owe there spouse anything, thats between them" attitude, Why would you never play with someone you know to be cheating?

By saying you would never engage in "relations" with someone known to be cheating, then arent you in fact saying, "I dont want to be involved" Becasue it would then involve you?

I guess Im just not understanding what you are saying.

Try being more clear instead of hopping around with one morale to another.

Saint Augustine FL
Username hidden
(223 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
p.s., Of all the couples with whom I've played, I can recall only about 2-3 of them asking point blank about my marital status. I don't know whether that's because they don't really care, or that they assume I'm single because I invite them to my place and/or have no problem making a date for weekends and/or evening dates.

Also for what it's worth, I have been contacted by a few couples who volunteered that they were married but not to each other. I passed.

Belle Chasse LA
Username hidden
(13323 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
JK4Fun, I prolly should apologize to you for cluttering your thread with chit chat. When MRick first posted his comments, I suggested that there are sometimes shades of gray in between the black and white of which he seems so certain. His response to me was that it's not cheating anymore if either spouse no longer views the marriage with sanctity. That comment left me scratching my head and wondering WTF. I mean, seriously, if a married person pretending to be single is willing to play behind his or her spouse's back, isn't that proof positive that he/she no longer views the marriage as having sanctity? And according to MRick, when that is the case, it is no longer "cheating" anyway. Ergo, by his logic, "cheating" is theoretically impossible, because the putative cheater has already de-sanctified the marriage by his/her willingness to cheat. Welcome to Circuitous Logic 101.

Then he started saying things like: "You are accountable for your actions only. Just because the guy fooled you into thinking that he is single, it doesn't take that responsibility of playing with him off of you." It gave me a headache trying to figure out what he thought was the difference between accountability and responsibility, and which of those he was saying was on the couple, and which was on the single "cheater." And when MRick started mixing up things like what was "irresponsible" with what was "forgivable," and throwing in what he viewed as "moral" or not, I decided it was better to just agree with his own suggestion that his comments were clear as mud, and move on.

Nic is normally a pretty intelligent and insightful poster here; why he chose to try and decipher rather than follow my lead and just flirt with the girls, IDK. But I agree with him that you should apologize to BiFem. Profusely.

Belle Chasse LA
Username hidden
(13323 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Really jk? Attacking women now? What a classy dude. Do you feel all manly now?

When a civil debate degenerates into name calling and cyber chest-pounding, I laugh and walk away and that is what I did in this thread. I explained the contradictions in mrick's posts and he responded by throwing a hissy fit. (Hell, he even apologized for it later.)

BiFem commented on his tantrum so you mock her with, "**in my best dumb bitch voice...**" That was out of line. I really don't care what some cyber-thug says to me but an unprovoked attack on a beautiful lady is uncalled for.

jk, you owe BiFem an apology. Are you man enough to admit your mistake and offer one?

New Orleans LA
Username hidden
(12735 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
it amazes me how many people who haven't had an original thought pass thru their heads in years, and have absolutely nothing to add to the conversation, often are clueless to the original thread and are too lazy to go back and actually read it, will stick their empty heads into the room just to say,

**in my best dumb bitch voice** "oooooh, someone's throwing a temper tantrum. oh, but not you, kind sir who claims to have a large penis. only those other bad people, hee, hee."

god bless these forms... or whoever you pray to... or if you don't pray at all, then YOU, that's it. bless you for these forums. bless someone for these forums god damn it. for it provides an opportunity for even the most thought challenged members of this site to... um... participate?

I AM SO PROUD OF AMERICA. GOD BLESS AMERICA, AND GOD BLESS THE SLS FORUMS!

Orlando FL
Username hidden
(976 posts)
« Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  ... 11  Next »
31 to 40 of 107
TOPIC: so he's not really single
This site does not contain sexually explicit images as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2256.
Accordingly, neither this site nor the contents contained herein are covered by the record-keeping provisions of 18 USC 2257(a)-(c).
Disclaimer: This website contains adult material. You must be over 18 to enter or 21 where applicable by law.
All Members are over 18 years of age.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
 
Copyright © 1998-2016 DashBoardHosting, LLC. All Rights Reserved.