Whats your take on this subject: Swingers Discussion 43025

155
Whats your take on this subject: Swingers Discussion 43025

Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

TOPIC: Whats your take on this subject

Created by: katnraycpl	The original post for this thread was deleted.

GoTo Page: 1 2

1 to 10 of 14

End

User Details are only visible to members.	Canadians DON'T like it doggie style. After all, somebody has to pull the sled!
South Riding VA			Username hidden (8165 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	I can't think of anyone we know in the US or Canada that doesn't believe in free speech. But is it really okay to yell "MOVIE" in a crowded fire house?
Saint Augustine FL			Username hidden (12572 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Curious, Those poor souls in the WTC that day were victims, they were guilty of nothin more than goin to work that day. churchill is way off base comparin them to nazis. The WTC victims compare more to the prisoners in the death camps, churchill could not be more wrong. Yes hitler was brilliant, brilliantly evil. He knew exactly how to pull the worst of evil outta the best of people, and he used that to rally his country, but dammit, look at the result. His way was the way of a coward, and totally without honor. Any idiot can inspire evil, it's easy. He lacked the guts to inspire good. He led by inspirin fear, fear led to hatred, hatred led to the death of millions. Yes the world can be made a more orderly place by exterminatin everyone that's different. And that's exactly what radical islam wants to do. If ya want historical comparison, what ben laden did on 911 was to turn downtown New York into a death camp. To compare the victims of 911s death camp to the perpetrators of other death camps is rediculous at best. It's people like churchill that enable people like hitler and benladen to exist and thrive. churchills rhetoric is pure garbage, and if that's how he really feels about America, we oughta deport him to north korea. Mike
Bedford PA			Username hidden (5527 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	My take on that churchill character is @%()&%$@#%&(%^$#^((^$@!$^())(&^$@$^&%^##@%&*((&%#$$^*(&*^%%$!!!!!!!!!! Mike
Bedford PA			Username hidden (5527 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	we never really get into asking this question to any we have met to date.Its really irrelevant in what we are seeking.If I was a betting person I woud bet its probably the same climate ourside of swing that it is on a national basis on thec political side of things. On religon , we woulld say that active christians are on the low percentage that we have met. Active menaing just that active in the church. As far as those that believe in a higher being ,I am not sure we have meet an atheist.
Sarasota FL			Username hidden (2070 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	I always have mixed feelings about freedom of speech issues. On the one hand, I am offended by remarks like that Colorado professor's. On the other hand, I recognize that the 1st Amendment right guaranteeing freedom of speech is essential to a free society. Sometimes that means we have to tolerate rather intolerable things like offensive statements (what offends some of us may not offend others) and even tolerating exhibitions by the Ku Kux Klan and neo-Nazi organizations. I guess protecting a free society and a free press makes it worth tolerating offensive people and organizations - as long as it's just their SPEECH or demonstrations. If they ACT on their (to us) offensive principles, then we can bring the full force of law to bear on them. "Democracy is the worst possible form of government, except for all the others." - - Winston Churchill
South Riding VA			Username hidden (8165 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Alright Terry, back to you. Now you can form an opinion about what he said, rather than about what others say he said...
Pittsburgh PA			Username hidden (1153 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Continue... * It should be emphasized that I applied the "little Eichmanns" characterization only to those described as "technicians." Thus, it was obviously not directed to the children, janitors, food service workers, firemen and random passers-by killed in the 9-1-1 attack. According to Pentagon logic, were simply part of the collateral damage. Ugly? Yes. Hurtful? Yes. And that's my point. It's no less ugly, painful or dehumanizing a description when applied to Iraqis, Palestinians, or anyone else. If we ourselves do not want to be treated in this fashion, we must refuse to allow others to be similarly devalued and dehumanized in our name. * The bottom line of my argument is that the best and perhaps only way to prevent 9-1-1-style attacks on the U.S. is for American citizens to compel their government to comply with the rule of law. The lesson of Nuremberg is that this is not only our right, but our obligation. To the extent we shirk this responsibility, we, like the "Good Germans" of the 1930s and '40s, are complicit in its actions and have no legitimate basis for complaint when we suffer the consequences. This, of course, includes me, personally, as well as my family, no less than anyone else. BIG QUOTE ENDS
Pittsburgh PA			Username hidden (1153 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	Terry: > It deffinetly means different things to everyone. Whenever that happens it's best to go straight to the source, and bypass all the punditry and spin. Thank God there is the Internet, and going to the source is often a click away. I just found an explanation the profesor gave at a press conference on the subject: BIG QUOTE BEGINS * Finally, I have never characterized all the September 11 victims as "Nazis." What I said was that the "technocrats of empire" working in the World Trade Center were the equivalent of "little Eichmanns." Adolf Eichmann was not charged with direct killing but with ensuring the smooth running of the infrastructure that enabled the Nazi genocide. Similarly, German industrialists were legitimately targeted by the Allies. * It is not disputed that the Pentagon was a military target, or that a CIA office was situated in the World Trade Center. Following the logic by which U.S. Defense Department spokespersons have consistently sought to justify target selection in places like Baghdad, this placement of an element of the American "command and control infrastructure" in an ostensibly civilian facility converted the Trade Center itself into a "legitimate" target. Again following U.S. military doctrine, as announced in briefing after briefing, those who did not work for the CIA but were nonetheless killed in the attack amounted to no more than "collateral damage." If the U.S. public is prepared to accept these "standards" when the are routinely applied to other people, they should be not be surprised when the same standards are applied to them.
Pittsburgh PA			Username hidden (1153 post)

User Details are only visible to members.	You explained where the term came from, but you haven't anwered my question: what does it mean?
Pittsburgh PA			Username hidden (1153 post)

GoTo Page: 1 2

1 to 10 of 14

End

TOPIC: Whats your take on this subject