Help
FORUMS › General Discussions › Open Forum › WTF
TOPIC: WTF
« Prev  1 ...  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  ... 562  Next »
651 to 660 of 5617
User Details are only visible to members.
Three reasons:

Orphan drug

Monoclonal antibody

Extremely rare disease

Windermere FL
Username hidden
(24561 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
WTF?

I had never even heard of 'aHUS', and how the fuck can a drug called Soliris cost over $400,000 a year?

Pittsburgh PA
Username hidden
(18530 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I haven't watched this but that may mean that Tamar Braxton is set to win.

Vero Beach FL
Username hidden
(7419 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Bindi Irwin is caught in a tangled legal web ... her "Dancing With The Stars" contract just got rejected because a judge needs proof her dad is dead.

Lawyers for the show submitted a minor's contract to an L.A. Superior Court judge ... it's required because Bindi is 17. Her mom Terri signed a form stating she gives up all rights to any money her daughter will make on the show.

Here's the rub. For some reason the judge wants the same release from Bindi's dad, the late Steve Irwin?. The judge said without proof of Steve giving up his rights to Bindi's money, "the court is unable to find that it is in the best interest of the minor to be bound by the terms of the contract."

It's unclear if the judge is unaware Steve died in 2006, or if she's just a stickler for a death certificate.

Windermere FL
Username hidden
(24561 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I think I am taking my three plants on vacation with me as I don't want to depend on anyone to take care of them. They may be coming to NYC in December too.

Vero Beach FL
Username hidden
(7419 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
yeah i got that. i just wanted to point out that it's not only women: it's also men, children, and seniors who are included in the "consent" issue for rape cases.

the decision to allow the defense for excluding BAC test results is BSC but that's JMO.

Bridgewater NJ
Username hidden
(9895 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
"and likely to make many see red."

I think that'll be because people aren't understanding what he's saying. He might have used this example purposefully to see who would fall into the mindtrap.

He's saying that if intoxication is an established reason to render people incapable of giving consent for sex, it should be a reason to negate consent for anything.

However, there is a funny area here where we hold some people responsible for their actions while not holding others.

Windermere FL
Username hidden
(24561 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
whoaaaa tbr.

gettung behind the wheel of a lethal weapon and driving while intoxicated and driving that lethal weapon is wayyyyy different than being on a date (or not), having a drink or two, and *being* raped.

"incapable of consent" in rape cases applies equally to men.

it also applies to seniors and people who have diminished mental capacity.

the folks who said "yes" to testing in DWI or DUI cases did so erroneously thinking it would keep them from getting arrested. IIRC, if you refuse a breathalyzer--that can mean an automatic arrest/trip to the police station.

that's not an apples to apples comparison--and likely to make many see red.

Bridgewater NJ
Username hidden
(9895 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I think the difference here is that the woman wasn't charged with drinking and sexing.

While I understand your point, I would think that while being able to throw out the breathalyzer result, one finds it inescapable to conclude that the defendant was not intoxicated.

"You can't prove he's intoxicated because he's too intoxicated to consent to your analysis."

It's like saying someone is too stupid to be a moron, too tall to be a giant, too fat to be obese, etc.

Windermere FL
Username hidden
(24561 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Well, if women are unable to consent to sex because they are intoxicated, and can bring rape charges against their "assailant" even if they consented while drunk, why shouldn't the court come down with this decision?

Fullerton CA
Username hidden
(19403 posts)
« Prev  1 ...  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  ... 562  Next »
651 to 660 of 5617
TOPIC: WTF
This site does not contain sexually explicit images as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2256.
Accordingly, neither this site nor the contents contained herein are covered by the record-keeping provisions of 18 USC 2257(a)-(c).
Disclaimer: This website contains adult material. You must be over 18 to enter or 21 where applicable by law.
All Members are over 18 years of age.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
 
Copyright © 1998-2016 DashBoardHosting, LLC. All Rights Reserved.