Help
FORUMS › General Discussions › Open Forum › WTF
TOPIC: WTF
« Prev  1 ...  1.1  2.1  3.1  4.1  5.1  6.1  7.1  8.1  9.1  10.1  ... 628  Next »
52 to 61 of 6275
User Details are only visible to members.
This is not Trump, no this is among us scientists. Obama has been using the IRS and the threats of audits to keep the journals from publishing honest science. What has been submitted for publication is the hard science completely documented that proves not only is climate change a scam but all of the pollution standards science is a scam.

Hundred of millions have been taken from private industry because of this cherry picked lying scam science done by one of the most respectable NGOs and University PHDs. This massive amount of money has gone into the pockets of the NGO people making them filthy rich and the PHDs and some is used to pay SEIU mafia pensions. Now this hard science is going to be published and the lawsuits will start and the end of the rein of the lying scam con artist Democratic criminal cartel. In simple English..Democrats have no way to get rich off the backs of the American people anymore like Al Gore and the Clinton's did.

Las Vegas NV
Username hidden
(3205 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
So ncal I am assuming you don't believe in global warming then...

Little Egg Harbor NJ
Username hidden
(1429 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
WTF? Not unlike his business ventures, it has to be somebody's fault. Marcus Welby the democrats fault.

"Hoodwinked even". Gosh darn it, you make me so proud when you talk like that. It's like Leo Gorcey is alive and well.

BT

New Orleans LA
Username hidden
(12394 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Hey nutcal, haven't you seen the back-pedaling your messiah has been doing? You've been scammed, bamboozled, hoodwinked even. None of those things will happen and the funny part is, in a year or so you will be blaming the Democrats for that too.

But it sure is entertaining to see you get all worked up.

~S~

New Orleans LA
Username hidden
(4859 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
NCAL,

When you're all done, can I borrow your spray paint? I don't need your paper bag. I have my own.

BT

New Orleans LA
Username hidden
(12394 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Current just wait until Trump takes office before you do the typical Democratic thing and blame him for all of the mess Obama and the democrats created. The whole Democratic world of lying scam science is going to be blown sky high very soon. With hard documented proof of how the frauds by NGO's and PHD's created the scams scienceS that has destroyed so much of our country...get ready for your Democratic lying scam artist machine to come crashing down. The Republican are not just bringing back freedom to the healthcare and securing the border, and ending the illegals voting and using welfare in America but they are going all out against the EPA and all the lying scam artist PHDs in our Universities. Its going to be a bloodbath and all you lying Democrats are going to be bled to death in court as EVERYONE you have destroyed is going to sue... Sixty years of lies is going to be front and center, no longer do you Democrats control the media and the message..no longer I CAN NOT WAIT!!!!

Las Vegas NV
Username hidden
(3205 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Current, consider a hypothetical Amendment which might have been adopted near the founding, phrased similarly to the 2nd Amendment: "The construction of fortifications being necessary to the defense against Indian attack on the frontier, no able-bodied male shall have the right to refuse conscription, without pay, for the construction of public works."

Now, do we ignore the statement of intent (just as the NRA urges us to do with the second amendment)? That would mean that in 2017 you could be yanked into service filling potholes, which obviously wasn't the intent back in 1789.

Isn't the more honest construction one that seeks to accomplish the clearly-stated intent, and not something else?

Belle Chasse LA
Username hidden
(13456 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
"I think it's reasonable for a court to consider the context of the document when looking at a bizarre construction like the sentence granting the right to keep and bear arms."

Fine. That reveals even more hypocrisy by conservatives who advocate "textualist" constitutional construction. To "bear arms" was, at the time, almost universally a term connoting organized military activities, not private, individual use of weapons. No one ever said he wanted to "bear arms" against a deer. You were said to "bear arms" only if it was done in a military organization.

Also, is the Amendment's use of "the people" a reference to individuals, or to the people collectively? (Elsewhere in the Constitution it is used both ways). So, to answer that question why not look at the first clause, which clearly refers to the well-regulated militia, not to any old fellow who individually wants a Glock with a 12-round clip.

The Heller decision is indefensible if you honestly subscribe to conservative constitutional interpretation. And that's even without resorting to the congressional debates surrounding the Amendment's proposal, which make abundantly clear that it was all about the militia, and nothing else.

Belle Chasse LA
Username hidden
(13456 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
"We are a big brother big gover(n)ment society"

Fixed it for ya ncal. You're welcome. I got your back.

~Big brudder

Charles Town WV
Username hidden
(2336 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I see your point.

We could debate semantics. IMO a better word would be insurgent.

Insurgent-a person who rises in forcible opposition to lawful authority, especially a person who engages in armed resistance to a government or to the execution of its laws; rebel.

Revolutionary-of, pertaining to, characterized by, or of the nature of a revolution, or a sudden, complete, or marked change:

Fullerton CA
Username hidden
(20824 posts)
« Prev  1 ...  1.1  2.1  3.1  4.1  5.1  6.1  7.1  8.1  9.1  10.1  ... 628  Next »
52 to 61 of 6275
TOPIC: WTF
This site does not contain sexually explicit images as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2256.
Accordingly, neither this site nor the contents contained herein are covered by the record-keeping provisions of 18 USC 2257(a)-(c).
Disclaimer: This website contains adult material. You must be over 18 to enter or 21 where applicable by law.
All Members are over 18 years of age.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
 
Copyright © 1998-2016 DashBoardHosting, LLC. All Rights Reserved.