Help
FORUMS › General Discussions › Open Forum › WTF
TOPIC: WTF
« Prev  1 ...  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  ... 725  Next »
351 to 360 of 7246
User Details are only visible to members.
"Starbucks plans on rolling out more color-changing drinks this year following the success of its Unicorn Frappuccino"

Didn't get to try it. It really hasn't been hot enough here yet to get me ready for that much sugar in a drink. Maybe next time..

Rutherford NJ
Username hidden
(8317 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
April 2.

He's still there - just now "Executive Chairman".

Windermere FL
Username hidden
(28391 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
When did Schultz become the former CEO?

He's a rags to riches story; raised in the projects of NYC. Capitalist, opportunist, innovator...political leftie...

BT

New Orleans LA
Username hidden
(13291 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
So, 10 days after it came/blew up in here...

Starbucks plans on rolling out more color-changing drinks this year following the success of its Unicorn Frappuccino, which drove a large amount of traffic to its U.S. chains during its five-day release in April.

"Just stay tuned because we have a lot more coming," the company's former CEO, Howard Schultz, told a Thursday earnings conference call, CNBC reports. He says the funky, pink and blue Frappuccino bumped traffic to its chains—sales will probably be seen in Starbucks' fiscal third-quarter earnings— and helped with the coffee's chains brand awareness.

He also called the drink "the most stunning example of our understanding of digital and social media and Instagram," ABC reports.

"We will bring at least one new entirely new drink into Happy Hour this year that is going to be as good as Unicorn or better," Starbucks CEO Kevin Johnson said on the call, CNBC reports.

Windermere FL
Username hidden
(28391 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Mayday, May 1, 2017, Liberal Communist must be in their glory. Orgasms all over the USA. Owebama gives BJ to Castro at DNC.

Thornton CO
Username hidden
(4041 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Trooper mainly flies Delta. And about 1/2 the time is upgraded to first class. He is on a Delta flight right now, Dallas bound. Very few problems specially now that he is doing the company's southern territory and no longer has to worry about flying around in snow storms, other then the 3 times a year he goes to Denver.

I have lots of friends that love Southwest, but I have yet to find a decent rate flying with them, anywhere I want to go when I want to go there. Usually its like 99 bucks to get somewhere and 700 to get back home. Yeah thanks I'll just take the 349.00 round trip Delta flight thanks.

Louisville KY
Username hidden
(21869 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
NCAL,

So, those are two regulations that you think should be suspended; Allowing passengers to get out of there seats without recourse whenever they want, and not removing passengers from the plane who act out?

Those two regulations, which cost the airlines millions in lawsuits...They should go away? Then, the airlines will make more money and not have to fill every seat?

So, that's how you'd end the issue of overbooking?

Interesting. Not sure about anyone else, but I know that I'd feel much safer if those two regulations went away.

BT

New Orleans LA
Username hidden
(13291 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Bridge those regulations have cost the airlines millions in lawsuits. Passengers are acting out just to sue now because they know the TV will run the video 24/7.

Airlines are screwed because they have to obey the FAA regulations or get is serious trouble.

Las Vegas NV
Username hidden
(5521 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
"NCAL...Why do I bother??"

That was our conclusion, hence the recently installed block. What a breath of fresh air not to see his drivel in every stinking thread.

~S~

New Orleans LA
Username hidden
(5571 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
NCAL...Why do I bother??

This was your first post:

"Get the regulations off the airlines so they can make money without having to make sure every single seat is filled."

When I asked which regulations were costly, you wrote:

"Golly gee how about the regulation that a passenger who gets our of their seat in the tarmack must be removed from the plane. Or a passenger that is acting out must be removed form the plane before that passenger becomes a potential threat..."

Golly gee...How often do those two things happen? Not very. So, how does removing those regulations make the airline more money so they don't need to fill every seat??

Your argument in this instance, like most, is a sieve.

BT

...And here comes HFT for with his follow up post sponsored by the Bromance Defense Fund.... 3...2...1...

New Orleans LA
Username hidden
(13291 posts)
« Prev  1 ...  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  ... 725  Next »
351 to 360 of 7246
TOPIC: WTF
This site does not contain sexually explicit images as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2256.
Accordingly, neither this site nor the contents contained herein are covered by the record-keeping provisions of 18 USC 2257(a)-(c).
Disclaimer: This website contains adult material. You must be over 18 to enter or 21 where applicable by law.
All Members are over 18 years of age.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
 
Copyright © 1998-2016 DashBoardHosting, LLC. All Rights Reserved.