155

|
|
TOPIC: Pitiful treatment of single males
|
|
|
Start
192 to 201 of 582
End
|
User Details are only visible to members.
|
Toptim
and if the couples aren't flakes the chances they carry too much drama is pretty good......... |
||
Havelock NC |
Username hidden
(41 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
VA.....must agree with the SF, at least based on our personal experience. EVERY ONE we have had any experience with has been exceptionally needy, very insecure, wanted WAY more than just sex, & habitual liars! I tend to believe some of them were using sls as a dating site. Now, I'm sure there's some terrific SFs out there, & I welcome them to disprove our theory! Must admit we have met a couple of crazed SM, but for the most part, our experiences with them have been MUCH better. And, of course, there's some whacked out couples too!
|
||
New Orleans LA |
Username hidden
(2773 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
We need to commission a research committee to find out how accurate you are. I'm thinking you're a lot closer to the mark than people might think. The fake/bs single female is highly underrated, imo. The amount of SF profiles that are really just covers so they can solicit for their websites is ridiculous. Obviously there are plenty of great, legitimate SF's on this site, and in this lifestyle, but when it comes to either this site (or others like it), the amount of porn sites and webcammers who disguise themselves as SF's is just insane.
T |
||
Danville PA |
Username hidden
(2133 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
In terms of percentage, single females probably rival single males as fakes/flakes/cheaters/whatever.
I'd say in our extremely non-scientific experience..... 40% of couples are bullshit. 80% of single males are bullshit 90% of single females are bullshit. Our success rate with single anythings is near-zero, outside of meeting them at parties. We've just given up. |
||
Chesapeake VA |
Username hidden
(12136 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
TT......agree!!!
|
||
New Orleans LA |
Username hidden
(2773 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
I know there are a lot of flaky SMs out there.
But I believe that there are just as many flaky SFs and couples out there too. |
||
Garner NC |
Username hidden
(3572 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
|||
Mount Juliet TN |
Username hidden
(662 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
The single guys we have met have all been polite and have been able to play longer than most of the guys in couples we have played with. So our experience has been good so far.
|
||
Terre Haute IN |
Username hidden
(10 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
We actually get ask not to certify them,
mostly because who we've played with are all listed as straight and are not ready to come out of the closet. |
||
Philadelphia PA |
Username hidden
(2092 post)
|
||
User Details are only visible to members.
|
cplofun
We agree with you about the paid members, we're always a little leery about those who are free members. We have even blocked them for a time because they would email us over and over and never be able to meet. However we do play with a lot of single males and for the most part they have all been gentlemen those that are rude never get to first base. As for verification we never give it out as if the guy is really good she wants him for herself. LOL |
||
Presque Isle WI |
Username hidden
(182 post)
|
||
Start
192 to 201 of 582
End
|
TOPIC: Pitiful treatment of single males
|