165
No Pics Of The Man: Swingers Discussion 2156571021
Busy Swingers Forum - everything you always wanted to know about swingers.
SwingLifeStyle Swingers Personal Ads. | SwingLifeStyle Swingers Clubs

Busy Swingers Forum

Everything you always wanted to know about swingers.

Create A Free Account

HELP
FORUMSGeneral DiscussionsMen TalkNo Pics Of The Man
TOPIC: No Pics Of The Man
GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Start   21 to 30 of 46   End
User Details are only visible to members.
I have seen the buff MrSed pics;)
Memphis TN
 
 
Username hidden (2749 post)
User Details are only visible to members.
tt, I can acknowledge a woman is pretty or even beautiful without specifically being attracted to her {actually, same with a dude, there's been lots of them that I thoguth were attractive but I wasn't particularly attracted to them}
Mcallen TX
 
 
Username hidden (5594 post)
User Details are only visible to members.
Don't despair, here look at my man ;)
Colts Neck NJ
 
 
Username hidden (12273 post)
User Details are only visible to members.
As a female, that is one of my biggest gripes when couples email us --- Mr.SB gets to look at pictures showing female butts, legs, breasts, backs etc and often ZERO pictures of the male half which means I have SQUAT to look at.
It's very easy to take a vanilla pose with selfportrait options on camera phones -- our Chistmas poses were self-portraits with my phone.

So, when a couple emails us and there are no pictures of both available on SLS website or attached to the email, we won't be meeting them.

Ms.SB
Memphis TN
 
 
Username hidden (2749 post)
User Details are only visible to members.
knb and Sed, I did clarify my statement by saying "to a dood."

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Obviously, women like the way doods look or people would never hook up.
Hunt Valley MD
 
 
Username hidden (3552 post)
User Details are only visible to members.
Weaver AL
 
 
Username hidden (4077 post)
User Details are only visible to members.
I understand TT, but this isn't the point. An attitude like that, leads to the concept that any old dood will do.

Beauty is indeed in the eyes of beholder. But "functional" would not be a description of the type of men bodies that I am attracted to.
Colts Neck NJ
 
 
Username hidden (12273 post)
User Details are only visible to members.
I disagree, Tim. A well-put-together male form is VERY visually appealing to me. There are some men I could look at all day and not get tired of looking at. {Of course touching *and more* of said forms is also appealing to me, too}

Just like the female form, when put together nicely.
Mcallen TX
 
 
Username hidden (5594 post)
User Details are only visible to members.
Well, to a dood, women's bodies are beautiful and men's bodies are functional.

Women are great works of art. Doods are fugly.

Women need a reason for sex. Men just need a place.
Hunt Valley MD
 
 
Username hidden (3552 post)
User Details are only visible to members.
*Women's bodies are beautiful. Men's bodies are functional.*

I beg to differ. Why would any woman disrespect herself by accepting a mere functional body? or am I misreading? can you please explain what you mean, thanks.
Colts Neck NJ
 
 
Username hidden (12273 post)
GoTo Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Start   21 to 30 of 46   End
TOPIC: No Pics Of The Man