Help
FORUMS › General Discussions › Men Talk › No Pics Of The Man
TOPIC: No_Pics_Of_The_Man
« Prev  1 ...  1.5  2.5  3.5  4.5  5.5  6.5  7.5  Next »
56 to 65 of 75
User Details are only visible to members.
"... lots of them that I thought were attractive but I wasn't particularly attracted to them... "

This puzzles me about you humans. Is attraction not what attracts you?

Username hidden
(2984 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
tt, I can acknowledge a woman is pretty or even beautiful without specifically being attracted to her {actually, same with a dude, there's been lots of them that I thoguth were attractive but I wasn't particularly attracted to them}

Fair Oaks TX
Username hidden
(12303 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Don't despair, here look at my man ;)

Username hidden
(17355 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
knb and Sed, I did clarify my statement by saying "to a dood."

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Obviously, women like the way doods look or people would never hook up.

Username hidden
(3625 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I ve come top the conclusion that if there is no male half showing there is a reason and we simply move on. We come as a couple and we seek couples. If either the male thinks it is enough to "sell" his wife and just tag along or he lacks the common sense to know that I need to be attracted to him or it ain't happening we just move along. We want a couple, with "couple" mentality. No male half, no excuse. I tire of the so called "valid" reasons and self important BS we are continually fed. I call BS to his job prevents us posting blah blah ...everyone can take a picture that gives an illusion of appearance without disclosing "who" you are. No matter how hot you think your wife might be she isn't enough to sell you to a couple. What the hell is the matter with people anyway? YOUR wife insists on seeing the male half don't the rest of us deserve the same respect?

Mrs Sav

Anniston AL
Username hidden
(5501 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I understand TT, but this isn't the point. An attitude like that, leads to the concept that any old dood will do.

Beauty is indeed in the eyes of beholder. But "functional" would not be a description of the type of men bodies that I am attracted to.

Username hidden
(17355 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
I disagree, Tim. A well-put-together male form is VERY visually appealing to me. There are some men I could look at all day and not get tired of looking at. {Of course touching *and more* of said forms is also appealing to me, too}

Just like the female form, when put together nicely.

Fair Oaks TX
Username hidden
(12303 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
Well, to a dood, women's bodies are beautiful and men's bodies are functional.

Women are great works of art. Doods are fugly.

Women need a reason for sex. Men just need a place.

Username hidden
(3625 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
*Women's bodies are beautiful. Men's bodies are functional.*

I beg to differ. Why would any woman disrespect herself by accepting a mere functional body? or am I misreading? can you please explain what you mean, thanks.

Username hidden
(17355 posts)
User Details are only visible to members.
@ Nic, THAT's my fave bare-chested pic of you....but I LIKE the sneak peek I got at the new addition too! {MUAH}

Fair Oaks TX
Username hidden
(12303 posts)
« Prev  1 ...  1.5  2.5  3.5  4.5  5.5  6.5  7.5  Next »
56 to 65 of 75
TOPIC: No Pics Of The Man
This site does not contain sexually explicit images as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2256.
Accordingly, neither this site nor the contents contained herein are covered by the record-keeping provisions of 18 USC 2257(a)-(c).
Disclaimer: This website contains adult material. You must be over 18 to enter or 21 where applicable by law.
All Members are over 18 years of age.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
 
Copyright © 1998-2016 DashBoardHosting, LLC. All Rights Reserved.